Sorry to burst your bubble but let say you are shooting at ISO400, D3s at ISO6400 still looks better.. i rest my case.. I am not going to push it anymore as picture speaks a thousand words.. happy shootingThat doesnt mean i need to sell away my A77 because my 5N performs better at studio shots of dpreview.
In my own observation, its not that significant up till iso1600 esp i normally shoot jpegs.
Sensor noise is not the only equation to a good picture. AF, handling, lenses lineup all can make up for that little difference in iso performance except for one who really shoots at iso3200 and above all the time.
But then with flashgun and fast primes, i seldom go past iso800 cos no matter how good iso3200 or 6400 is (even with D3S), it will never be better looking than a lower iso ones.
I always thought in order to get a good picture, we must know how to control light and not be limited by sensor technology.
rasdeep said:Sorry to burst your bubble but let say you are shooting at ISO400, D3s at ISO6400 still looks better.. i rest my case.. I am not going to push it anymore as picture speaks a thousand words.. happy shooting
rasdeep said:Sorry to burst your bubble but let say you are shooting at ISO400, D3s at ISO6400 still looks better.. i rest my case.. I am not going to push it anymore as picture speaks a thousand words.. happy shooting
Some news from SAR.
Another “source” sent me this: “I was informed by person from SONY. Both camera was designed with special Bionz processor, but before releasing they put some better and new one processor inside camera and that make the problem. That is why they are going to release 2.0. It should work perfectly. Lets hope.”
If the rumors coming from asian websites are correct version 2.0 should be out in early November!
i think you are missing my point, read post #13 on page one."Sorry to burst your bubble but let say you are shooting at ISO400, D3s at ISO6400 still looks better.. i rest my case.. I am not going to push it anymore as picture speaks a thousand words.. happy shooting"
But unfortunately I cannot afford the D3S even if its IQ at ISO6400 is better than A77 at ISO400.
PS.
Let's go back to the Thread Topic pls! stop all these nonsense bashing. The TS is asking opinion from A77 user not 5n or A33 or A55 but A77 So please provide advice to the TS
Though my only gripe it's APS-C.![]()
Bro.. do you think they would think the A900 replacement would be a SLT?
I have seen many (me included)... when you need it... it good to know you can use it.i never seen a photographer (even with d3s) wacking iso6400 all the way without a flashgun.
Yup, I really wonder why people nowadays can give their perspective on certain products or issues just based on other people's review or comments and not having the actual thing to test out.
Anyway, I already gave my personal experience as an normal user on overall package to the TS, not as a "so called professional" who pixel peeps at 100% on high iso all the time.
they might release a traditional DSLR and maybe FF SLT... see how A900 is stop production so they might bring in FF body
I have seen many (me included)... when you need it... it good to know you can use it.
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/ready-lights-action/980858-beerfest-asia-2011-anson-photography.html -> Nearly all the stage shot were taken at ISO 6400.
PS.
Let's go back to the Thread Topic pls! stop all these nonsense bashing. The TS is asking opinion from A77 user not 5n or A33 or A55 but A77 So please provide advice to the TS
As an A55 user, I was pretty certain the A77 was going to be my next cam. Now I’m not so sure.
DPREVIEW talks about mushy JPEGs, high noise and laggy operation - not exactly a rave review for such an expensive piece of kit. A couple of posts on this site talk about under exposure in low light. I’ve even noticed a bro selling his on the buy and sell as they were unhappy with it. What gives?
Well done to your shoots, looks very clean and nice timing on those captures as well.
Anson said:Credit goes mainly to the gals.. I am just happen to be passing by the area.