seanlim said:ooh...any idea hw much is the F6?...looks reeeaaallly nice or the Nikon FM3A?:thumbsup:
lastly, the film is 24 or 36 exp.?
funny?I guess lazy..didnt even bother to do any research before asking questions..code said:i must say sean is quite a funny chap....
Like NW75 said... you really don't understand photography nor appreciate the beauty of it.seanlim said:lol....no D50 i wont throw away lah;p ...i also just realised an F6 is like 3k? lols......i was going hrough my old pics-those instant camera kind- i realised that actually last time when only got film,...everyshot is use "heart" take one...now Digital just snap...then lack the warmth to it (the way i look at it) so i was wondering that Nikon SLR going to bo liao ...so i thought might as well get one. i personally prefer quality of film to DSLR = )
then y go DSLR?go back to film lar....cheaper alsoseanlim said:lol....no D50 i wont throw away lah;p ...i also just realised an F6 is like 3k? lols......i was going hrough my old pics-those instant camera kind- i realised that actually last time when only got film,...everyshot is use "heart" take one...now Digital just snap...then lack the warmth to it (the way i look at it) so i was wondering that Nikon SLR going to bo liao ...so i thought might as well get one. i personally prefer quality of film to DSLR = )
that because u leave the processing to the lab...that why it(film) look nicer...i think u too young to appreciate the good stuff(d50)seanlim said:i personally prefer quality of film to DSLR = )
bro if u letting go yr d50 cheap ...pm meseanlim said::bsmilie: omg kena again :flame:
:mad2:
Its never too young to start...its never too late to learneow said:that because u leave the processing to the lab...that why it(film) look nicer...i think u too young too appreciate the good stuff(d50)
seanlim said::bsmilie: ....lol...i getting really confused here
seanlim said:ooh...any idea hw much is the F6?...looks reeeaaallly nice or the Nikon FM3A?:thumbsup:
lastly, the film is 24 or 36 exp.?
wow..thanks! a very concise break down..:bigeyes:bigfatfish said:if u dont mind the extra work of bringing film to develop , collecting it and not knowing if it turns out well...yeah you should get a film SLR. I think film is great for hobby.
anyway, film cost about 3-5 dollars per roll since you are so lazy to find out. in addition, the cheaper workflow is to develop and scan to CD. Some shops let you do that. Total cost of everything is $4(film)+$3(developing)+$2.50(scan to CD)= $9.50 for 36 exposures.
You might want to do slides. Breakdown is like this: Slides $9 + Developing at Ruby's $4 without mounting = $13. Mounts are $7 for 100 pieces if i m not wrong.
Then again, you might wanna do your own black and white developing. Breakdown is like this: Black and White film $5 or Bulk Rolled ones ($2.50) , Chemicals cost about $30-40 dollars but can last you at least 20-30 rolls, Bulk Roller ($50), Developing Tank ($25) + miscellenous beakers/measuring cylinders/thermometer $20.
End of the day. Work + Time input + Learning curve surely exceeds the amount of input in digital workflow which is done mostly on Photoshop. But the rewards are satisfaction of seeing your slides on the light box, developing your black and white prints, and lastly, you have REAL PHYSICAL RAW IMAGES that you can physically keep unlike digital file formats.
okay with this inputs, now i think you can do the math for yourself, lazzy boy.