Thats actually why I linked it here.
He now certainly has a Nikon bias, but in the end despite that, the K3 made him grudgingly give it the best thumbs up recommendation for a Pentax camera review ever on his site.
Because it was too good
Phew that was a long review! But I really didn't detect any Nikon bias at all - in fact in my eyes the review was nothing but glowingly in favor of the K3. The only bad things he had to say was the video implementation, AF performance and lens selection still lagging behind Canikon. The former I don't know since I don't use, but the latter two are probably true (in terms of AF tracking and native long lenses with AF anyway).
"We can safely say that the K-3 is the most compelling Pentax DSLR that has been produced to date, and it may also be the most sophisticated APS-C DSLR currently on the market for shooting stills. At $1299 it is very competitively and fairly priced, and it is a great value."
"The K-3 sets new benchmarks for APS-C image quality, framerate, and buffer size: something that other manufacturers should be very jealous of!"
"he Pentax K-3 is a pleasure to use, and it has exceeded our expectations in many ways. We think that this will be a dream camera for many enthusiast photographers, but it will certainly not be out of reach at its reasonable price of $1299. With the K-3, Pentax has successfully improved on their old flagship and addressed virtually all of the generational issues associated with it. This was undoubtedly no easy task, as the K-5 II was already a top-rated DSLR to begin with."
Maybe I'm guilty of selective reading and these are taken out of context - but where is the Nikon bias and Pnetax bashing? :dunno:
