Which 1 of this 3 will u choose?

[polo_pro10]

Hi there for ppl who tried before the above lenses, can u pls recommend which 1 u will choose in terms of sharpness, contrast & durability? NOT in terms of money & pls do not mention about other lenses.

 

[dundee]

they all Perform poorly in regard to durability..... even the L ;(

 

[polo_pro10]

they all Perform poorly in regard to durability..... even the L ;(

But which is better within this three?

 

[Adam Goi]

What's your budget?

 

[polo_pro10]

What's your budget?

No budget for these lenses.

 

[AlexLum]

But which is better within this three?

Better in what? marco? fast af? The important question is what you want to shoot?

 

[Speed]

Sigma! Cheap and Good! But if you have no concern on budget, then the Canon L lens would be my choice!

 

[Adam Goi]

If you can stretch your budget a little more (actually dunno how much more), get the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM! It's worth every cents you'll pay!

 

[invert_studio]

Think this will give you a easy guide if $$ is not an issue:

Buy the sigma if you use mostly from 70 to 200mm and would like taking indoor once in a while.
1. F4 on the wider end is really useful
2. Sharpness is comparable from 70 to 180mm to the L

Buy the L if you use mostly from 200 to 300mm and would only take outdoor (zoo etc).
1. F5.6 is painful
2. Most of the time a tripod is needed
3. Push-pull is troublesome
4. Sharpness throughout the range (think this is the only reason it will win over many people).

Have gone through this and I select the sigma as I seldom use the tele end

 

[Stoned]

I think the Sigma beats your other 2 options flat when u factor in the price.

 

[polo_pro10]

Thanks for all the responds.