oeyvind said:Not sure what this prove my old Dual 1.8 G5 finished the task in 59.64 sec
It proves that this particular filter benefits tremendously from a dual processor
oeyvind said:Not sure what this prove my old Dual 1.8 G5 finished the task in 59.64 sec
kahheng said:You know the version of PS is also relevant.
In PS 7.01, 2:00
In PS CS2, 1:30
P4 3.0C, 2 gig of DDR400 value ram running at slowest ram timings.
My dinky Thinkpad running a Pentium M 1.5Ghz with 1 gig of RAM did 2:31 using PS 7.01 (I don't have CS2 installed on the laptop). The timings were uncannily the same using CS.
kahheng said:It proves that this particular filter benefits tremendously from a dual processor
Wai said:hmm....
Let me try on my Dual Xeon 3Ghz, Prescott 3.6Ghz dual core, Pentium 820 dual core and Pentium 3.8Ghz Extreme Edition
guess which will be fastest?
rueyloon said:I'm quite suprised by the speed of my machine compared to the rest here considering it is at least 2+ years old. Maybe the rest of the intel system are also 2 year old machines ? maybe, because I don't keep track if intel's progress.
nightpiper said:mine: 1min 15sec
old 478pins 3GHz Prescott Intel
1GB of old DDR RAM
2x SATA drive (one as scratch disk)
X700 ATI AGP graphics card.
really curious how a dual core will run... :devil: :devil:
:bsmilie: :bsmilie:
Parka said:Mine's a 3.5 year old machine.
Pentium 4, 2.oGHZ. 1GB ram
Time - 4 min 40 secs.
Wah. A bit slow, but I can take it. haha.
I'm interested to know the timing of dual core PC timings, esp when it's $1000+ cheaper than dual core Macs.
Zerstorer said:I expect AMD x2 and Intel dual-cores to notch even better timings than anything posted so far.