My first roll of film I used was the roll included in the package, and the photos sucked. I changed to a Kodak Max 200, with pretty interesting results.
BTW, I scanned the images with a cheap and crappy $99 Mustek scanner so....
LOMO LC-A Photos
- Thread starter lyrrad
- Start date
- Status
My first roll of film I used was the roll included in the package, and the photos sucked. I changed to a Kodak Max 200, with pretty interesting results.
BTW, I scanned the images with a cheap and crappy $99 Mustek scanner so....
i like the 2nd picture 
+ sense of perspective
+ the tone of colour
can be tweaked to increase the contrast and prob boast some colours a keeper
+ sense of perspective
+ the tone of colour
can be tweaked to increase the contrast and prob boast some colours
a keeper aye manz, ya shooting on A or manual exp?
ya tried to mount a flash on it ?
mounted a nikon flash & it works!
haha
but really, can we really compare the optics then?
hm...
ya tried to mount a flash on it ?
mounted a nikon flash & it works!
haha
but really, can we really compare the optics then?
hm...
Originally posted by quackaroo
i like the 2nd picture
+ sense of perspective
+ the tone of colour
can be tweaked to increase the contrast and prob boast some colours
The original stills look better on paper, my scanner just doesn't do it any justice....
haha wld love to see the 2nd one
if you dont look carefully enuff.
it looks like a medium format camera (teeehehee)
i can see ur scan lines (tan lines of the scanned photo)
if you dont look carefully enuff.
it looks like a medium format camera (teeehehee)
i can see ur scan lines (tan lines of the scanned photo)
- Status
Similar threads
