LOMO LC-A Photos


Status
Not open for further replies.
#1






My first roll of film I used was the roll included in the package, and the photos sucked. I changed to a Kodak Max 200, with pretty interesting results.
BTW, I scanned the images with a cheap and crappy $99 Mustek scanner so....
 

quackaroo

New Member
Jan 17, 2002
373
0
0
35
Singapore
www.illumn.com
#2
i like the 2nd picture :)

+ sense of perspective
+ the tone of colour

can be tweaked to increase the contrast and prob boast some colours :) a keeper :)
 

tucker

New Member
Jul 13, 2002
431
0
0
singapore
www.flickr.com
#3
aye manz, ya shooting on A or manual exp?
ya tried to mount a flash on it ?
mounted a nikon flash & it works!
haha

but really, can we really compare the optics then?
hm...
 

#4
Originally posted by quackaroo
i like the 2nd picture :)

+ sense of perspective
+ the tone of colour

can be tweaked to increase the contrast and prob boast some colours :) a keeper :)
The original stills look better on paper, my scanner just doesn't do it any justice....
 

#5
Originally posted by tucker
aye manz, ya shooting on A or manual exp?
ya tried to mount a flash on it ?
mounted a nikon flash & it works!
haha

but really, can we really compare the optics then?
hm...
Not tried it dude.

Don't get u about comparing optice though.
 

quackaroo

New Member
Jan 17, 2002
373
0
0
35
Singapore
www.illumn.com
#6
haha wld love to see the 2nd one :)

if you dont look carefully enuff.
it looks like a medium format camera (teeehehee)

i can see ur scan lines (tan lines of the scanned photo)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom