Yay!! We got a winner!!
Unsurprisingly most of my friends placed their bets on Set 3 to be a full-framer. Unfortunately for them I am $105 richer Yes. Set 3 is from the X-E1. The details & noise control is outstanding! My brief analysis of the three systems while I recover from a sore shoulder ..
Set 1: M9 - A thoroughbred with an analogue brain. High ISO is weak (think ISO 1600 film) and you get the picture. Grainy .. noisy .. but still useable to a certain extent. High lens dependency and extremely capable under the right condition. DNG files can be massaged for far better output.
Set 2: D600 - For those deciding between the X-E1 and D600: The RAW file from the D600 will blow the X-E1 away. The DR, highlights etc are all there waiting to be unleashed if you love to tinker. Coupled with tons of customization and add-ons the D600 is a different class altogether. Fast and accurate AF makes it suitable for a wide genre in a bulkier body.
Set 3: X-E1 - The X-E1 has a 'show hand' approach. The jpegs are pretty close to what you get from those processed from Silkypix. Prob 5% more? The details from jpegs are amazing. Loves to flaunt its ISO might with nicely rendered colors. However there are cases whereby details are lost with blown highlights with the aggressive use of high ISO. AF is reasonably fast in good lighting but it's no OMD. If you look carefully at the tree shots the DOF is also noticeably deeper (even when wide open f1.4) so not really for bokeh-lover.
lol but not a fair comparison la...
The Fuji 35mm 1.4 resolving power so high, and at 1.4 able to use lower ISO compares to the other two. Lenses are equally important too
but all 3 are great cameras! Choose your own poison!!!