Oh well... Anyway, good luck.Hahahaha.
Nope. No lawyer.
But we have a just cause and we have the ability to make noise.
Who needs a lawyer!
Oh well... Anyway, good luck.Hahahaha.
Nope. No lawyer.
But we have a just cause and we have the ability to make noise.
Who needs a lawyer!
jfxberns said:Well, that's where it requires actions as a group. If 1 person finds a problem, it's an exception. If 100 people all have the same problem, it's a provable defect.
After some consideration, it seems to me we (D600 owners) have grounds to take action here in Singapore.
Are there others out there that agree that we are entitled to some remedy to this problem??
Are there others willing to stand up and take action?
Zaknafein said:If u have a plan tat can make nikon come up with a remedy, im in
ageha said:Well, good luck with proving the lubricant and debris on the sensor aren't caused by the owner.
Zaknafein said:Does the 3k shots video proof on the internet counts?
But then again, the video cant proof tat lens was not changed
The video has nothing to do with your particular copy of the camera.
I give up.yea. true
maybe we can send in ours to nikon and request them to do 3k shots.
then it will be done at their lab and they can ensure no lens is changed hahaha
if only....
Zaknafein said:a group is good, but how big will this grp need to be to be effective?
how many d600 owners are there in CS?
@ageha lol, just kidding
went nikon 5 times average every month go once 12k shuttle count.. last 2 time sit in nikon for 4 days and they claim inspect the cam is trying to waste my time!.
look at the circles.!
andugo said:went nikon 5 times average every month go once 12k shuttle count.. last 2 time sit in nikon for 4 days and they claim inspect the cam is trying to waste my time!.
look at the circles.!
ageha said:Relax, he's just kidding for sure.
how big will this grp need to be to be effective?
how many d600 owners are there in CS?
jfxberns said:Why limit to CS?
It's really not about how many people, it's about the perception you create. If Nikon sees being silent and taking no action as the easiest option, that's what they do.
If they are put in a situation where silence and inaction make them look bad, then they will be more likely to act.
ageha said:The dpreview.com review and various other articles didn't have an effect on Nikon even though DPR is probably the most important platform. Do you think 50 people in front of NSC Singapore would change that?
Zaknafein said:Although im quite doubtful nikon would do anything, i dun mind giving it a shot if we can gather enough ppl. No harm anyway except spend some effort and time.
Of cos we dun hve to limit only to CS d600 owners. I was just thinking most ppl into photog would already be in cs
saberlancer said:From the way you put it, 'giving it a shot', 'no harm trying', 'doubtful nikon will do anything', the case is already lost..lol
This attitude go mkt ask auntie give 50cts discount also wont win..kekeke
Just kidding
We lost already when we exchanged our cash for the dusty D600.
Just kidding...