Today I shoot a wedding, a photographer shoot together with me, I saw the shots using omnibounce, really buay tahan, so let the photographer use my LS PJ, the photographer also said the effects very much different.freecloud said:Thank all your guys.
I now have a lightsphere. It is big which is very troublesome to bring it with me.
Shall I buy an omnibounce?
I have never used flashes before
catchlights said:Today I shoot a wedding, a photographer shoot together with me, I saw the shots using omnibounce, really buay tahan, so let the photographer use my LS PJ, the photographer also said the effects very much different.
So my advice to you is: don't buy an omnibounce, borrow from someone and do a side by side test yourself.
catchlights said:Today I shoot a wedding, a photographer shoot together with me, I saw the shots using omnibounce, really buay tahan, so let the photographer use my LS PJ, the photographer also said the effects very much different.
So my advice to you is: don't buy an omnibounce, borrow from someone and do a side by side test yourself.
Can consider this time is a side by side comparison, the photographer I brought with me use omnibounce, I can't stand the effect omnibounce produce, so I let the photographer use my LSII PJ.Bleuwhale said:Hm... interesting.
I am using the PJ LSII, but I have never heard of the omnibounce as "buay tahan".
Have actually received great reviews on the omni and had seriously considered it. After al, its half the price of a LSII. Anyhow, i LOVE the bounce effect that LSII produces and beyond its size, I have little complaints.
Cheers
I have the LS classic (discontinue), and the LSII PJ (what Cathy Photo is selling now).freecloud said:I already bought a omnibounce two days ago. The gary fong LSII is too big to carry in my bag. Maybe, I can use it home.
BTW, most photographers in singapore are not using gary fong LSII, but another kind of lightsphere ba?
wan said:how abt the minisoft box dat is sold in eastgear. is there any difference from from the 2 mentioned lightsphere n omnibounce
drumma said:that one if i'm not wrong is called lumiquest?
i think u can only attached it to ur in-built flash. whereas LS and OB are for external flashes?
I share with others how both things works before, and agreed with you with ones should not use omni-bounce in open space, I believe that most people think it looks so stupid to use a LS in public and don't understand why it costs so much, so prefer to use something more compact and handy. :bsmilie:willyfoo said:hmm.. interesting no one mentioned how the omni-bounce and the LS diffuses light..
..............
txv611 said:HI guys,
Is the Lumiquest Soft screen which is meant for our camera IN-BUILT flash necessary? I do find the in-built flash harsh but is the Lumiquest Soft Screen a gimmick or does it work? Thanks.
http://www.lumiquest.com/softscreen.htm
catchlights said:Softer lights yielded by bigger light source, if you are taking a head and shoulder shot, you want a nice soft light create by a diffuser or softbox, the diffuser/softbox has to be same size as the subject, and place it as close as possible, just outside the picture frame.
For this Lumiquest Soft screen, it has a size limitation, so the softness of the light also limited.
It works to a certain extent, but at the expense of your flash power.txv611 said:HI guys,
Is the Lumiquest Soft screen which is meant for our camera IN-BUILT flash necessary? I do find the in-built flash harsh but is the Lumiquest Soft Screen a gimmick or does it work? Thanks.
http://www.lumiquest.com/softscreen.htm
If you use an external flash, the Lumiquest Softbox (not the soft screen) is useful. I have shot a wedding using it before. There are still shadows but softer than direct flash or omnibounce. Most of the time I would have bounced the flash but that time, the ceiling of the house was painted yellow and it would affect the colour of the bounced flash, so I had no choice but not to bounce.txv611 said:Is the Lumiquest worth the effort? Or is the improvement so minute that the product should not be considered? I only indoor portrait shots of my kids and looking for a way to reduce the harsh flash. Since I do not use an external flash, i suppose this is the only product i could find for in-built flash. Any alternatives?
in-built flash has limited power, if you want to creat soft light from in-built flash, it may not even powerfull to give you correct exposure to you picutres.txv611 said:Is the Lumiquest worth the effort? Or is the improvement so minute that the product should not be considered? I only indoor portrait shots of my kids and looking for a way to reduce the harsh flash. Since I do not use an external flash, i suppose this is the only product i could find for in-built flash. Any alternatives?
txv611 said:Is the Lumiquest worth the effort? Or is the improvement so minute that the product should not be considered? I only indoor portrait shots of my kids and looking for a way to reduce the harsh flash. Since I do not use an external flash, i suppose this is the only product i could find for in-built flash. Any alternatives?