Saw the photographer's FB page he's just a Project Manager with a Laser printing firm
guess he's just a free lancer or part timer
guess he's just a free lancer or part timer
if it is part of the package deal, yes. without the free gifts, the customer may not be induced to sign the contract in the first place. that is the misrepresentation. in this case, the wedding photography was not a free gift but was part of the bridal package. the unhappy customer can also lodge a complaint to CASE.
another example. you go to a restaurant, which offers you a free dish as part of their dinner promo. you suffer food poisoning after eating their free dish. can you sue?
May be a new trend... Photographers beware... Name and shame on the way...
http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/lol-another-netizen-compiles-her-jialat-wedding-pictures-after-couples-hilariously-bad-photos-go?xtor=CS3-5
May be a new trend... Photographers beware... Name and shame on the way...
http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/l...-couples-hilariously-bad-photos-go?xtor=CS3-5
Actually I see the social media as a good way to weed out those bad photographers, and keep the good ones in check.
Its impossible to bring to CASE.
Photographer didn't dishonour his services or scam the couple. He done his services and delivered his goods as promised.
Who is to say the photos are bad? Is CASE qualified to say that? If yes, by what or whose standard?
Photography is an art. No right or wrong. So in the law, its v hard to prove anything.
Even bring to CASE. What the CASE can do, they cannot enforce. They will write a letter to photographer or bridal shop . It is the end.
If CASE can solve problems, they have many complaints everyday . Nothing will happen. It is just for Show only.
Saw the photographer's FB page he's just a Project Manager with a Laser printing firm
guess he's just a free lancer or part timer
You don't have to be a photographer to be a wedding photographer.
5D Mark IV and L lens take care of everything.
all photographers must get a "licence" before they are allow to offer their services
You don't have to be a photographer to be a wedding photographer.
5D Mark IV and L lens take care of everything.
Maybe the next wedding camera to get is the D500. Can spray and pray in the dark at high FPS with a superb AF system. Everything sure can catch after that slowly edit
agreed, not that pictures don't come out, it is only "Buay Swee", who is there and how to justify "Swee Buay Swee"?
anyway, one way to do it is to make it a law that all photographers must get a "licence" before they are allow to offer their services, but who will want to open this "can of worms"?
Does licensing photography service ever work? Who in his capacity can define what is better, good, best photo?
Example a chicken rice hawker with good picture on his signboard sell a tasteless chicken rice to you ... do u complain after you ate it and insist a refund? NO.
Its the buyer responsibility to do his homework before handing out the cash to the seller. And is the chicken rice hawker licensed ? YES.
Nailed that one on the head...buyer beware!
Moral of the story - look for the hawker with the longest line and who sells out before closing time.