Not always true. Singapore hospitals operate on a cost recovery model, so there is little if any social medicine. It is run as a business. Contrast that with a country like Cuba, which has probably the best medical expertise in Latin America. Yeah it is a poor country but access to quality health care for the ordinary person is very good.
My good friend recently had life threatening cancer (he's in his 30s). If not for the fact that he had a good employer that picked up his entire medical bill, he probably might not be alive today. That's because money talks and it enabled him to get fast track service at the National Cancer Centre. If he didn't have the full means to pay, his case would have dragged for months and he by all accounts won't be around today.
in general,
there are only so many countries that are willing to subsidise medical costs to a significant degree.. effectively you have to admit that like it or not, the subsidies have to come from somewhere, unless the government is going to print money japanese occupation style, in which case it does not work either. where does the money come from? taxes.
you can argue that oh, the taxes come from the richer people.. but hey, if the richer people are going to pay more taxes, obviously it will somehow trickle down to the poorer people eventually. they will still pay. there is an overall social balancing effect.
"taxes are paid by the people least able to avoid it."
who are going to be the ones who are unable to avoid taxation effects? the people who only survive on bare necessity. and which group would this be? the very people who cannot really afford medical costs in the first place.
big picture wise, from a logical point of view i guess you could say this for most countries. unless there be a special situation, i guess.
another way of looking at it could be the fact that while basic medical treatment is definitely going to give marginal costs to society as a whole, i.e. the doctor sitting in his office has to be paid anyways, and the medication given is mass produced, etc.. when you are talking about higher level treatment, especially those with serious conditions, where only so many companies have the expertise and money to research and develop medications that work.. then obviously prices will be controlled. there has always been an argument whether the prices of many drugs should be brought down, when they can.. in that case there is no real incentive for the r&d people to do it at all.. since there is not much benefit for a long-term "investment" of time and cash. in such cases, i doubt that every country in the world can cover it.
and in the very first place, i don't know, i think the system is going to suffer as a result, of course it defers from person to person. all i know is that the public practices here around my school area are notorious for being useless. a few of my friends went, and they didn't even get prescriptions for their flu-like symptoms.. all just kena the same medical advice - saltwater.. like it is the universal cure.
note that i'm not saying that the situation in singapore is the best way to go about it. the thing is, whatever direction you head, there are compromises. i have not really read up nor studied medical systems across the board.. but there are certainly arguments against a welfare-orientated system and for a welfare-orientated system and surely, both should have a chance to be aired. i mean, i'm all for a welfare-orientated system if i require it, to be brutally honest.. but surely i would feel very irritated if my taxes are going to go into bypass operations for a person whose mismanagement of his health results in a tortured heart (literally), because i am paying for someone else's inadequacies. i mean, you could push it to an extreme parallel example whereby the government carries out car repairs for people who get into accidents.. perhaps you would not feel so pissed off if you are paying for someone who crashed his car because of a car manufacturing fault.. but if you are paying for someone who was drink driving?
i am glad that someone has taken the time to respond this way though. i am not sure why there exists a certain group of people who seek to get into arguments about how old i am, whether people around me have gotten sick. it is a null point, and to correct your perception, it is not true. but it is the internet, i can claim whatever i want. you could also claim that a lot of people around you have gotten sick, whether it is true or not is another thing altogether. be mature. i do not understand why making a factual statement that the examples in life have not incurred such high medical costs somehow makes people think i am unsympathetic. not everyone is going to be lucky to go through their whole life without having such occurences..
but my view is that being strong, instead of feeling stressed out; being positive instead of just cursing and swearing and pointing fingers at everything in your life.. or acting irrationally is going to help anyone, least of all yourself.