But why should the camera be in the bag. It should be where it is most assessable. You might miss something worth shooting if need to fumble in the bag.
Seems DSLR marketing has shifted.
- Thread starter Reportage
- Start date
But why should the camera be in the bag. It should be where it is most assessable. You might miss something worth shooting if need to fumble in the bag.
No, it's just that Full Auto hasn't matured yet... Remember that the computer is stupid for now, dosen't have enough processing power to love... Not even the 10 most powerful supercomputers in the world combined together can enable love in a computer. Maybe 100 sets of them can give rudimentary love... So maybe they will have to squeeze a microcomputer with the processing power of 5 Core I7s to get good auto..
Agreed. Though the big difference that sets seasoned PGs to those "want face" prople is that we have different lenses from them. They have crappy kit lens, we have high quality ones (For canon users like me, its L lenses)... They treat the dslrs like PnS.
Last edited:
Season photographer or not is by the photo he/she produce, not by equipment.
So if I want to look season, I will chain up all my pro rate lenses and wear like a necklace? :bsmilie:
Btw, just screen thru some shots taken by you, many of those crappy kit lens can shoot better than your L. :bsmilie:
Last edited:
Can't blame me... forgot to bring my tripod that day :embrass: so I couldn't hold my camera properly.
Sion
Senior Member
yes, i agree that the camera should be where it is most accessible (not assessible btw
), but for those teenagers who don't even know what DSLR stands for and use them for cam whoring, i think they will be so fixed up in cam whoring than to notice the golden moment..Anyway, there is always an option of quick-access bag, right? Or are you implying that we should all ditch our bag so that we'll be ready for the "moment"? no, right?
Moreover, i was saying why can't they put it in the bag? i was referencing to xtemujin's post..
i just don't like the fact that DSLR, a tool for photographers, both pros and hobbyist, is used as a fashion accessory; that is the thing that i really hate about it.. being a fashion accessory.. so degrading, man.. some people buy DSLR just for the sake of fashion..
Honestly I would recommend them to buy DSLR lookalikes like the Powershot S5...
the thing is they are so poisoned to buy DSLR.. Cheap kit lens can produce great images, bro, and kit lens are not crappy, in fact plastic lenses are not crappy as well, they are still made using complicated physics.. The problem is not with the lens, but users..
I thought you don't need tripod? Why you couldn't hold your cam properly? I thought you have good hands like you said in the plane spotting thread you started?
just joking, man, no hard feelings, k?
Last edited:
there are the rare few who knows what they are doing. but i wont deny a large majority of my counterparts are doing what u say.
:dunno: what can we do? rich parents
My hands are usually strong, but the combination of flu+ headache + antibiotics made my hands slightly jellier that day...the thing is they are so poisoned to buy DSLR.. Cheap kit lens can produce great images, bro, and kit lens are not crappy, in fact plastic lenses are not crappy as well, they are still made using complicated physics.. The problem is not with the lens, but users..
I thought you don't need tripod? Why you couldn't hold your cam properly? I thought you have good hands like you said in the plane spotting thread you started?
just joking, man, no hard feelings, k?
What's the use of a dslr if they just use for cam whoring? Its basically overkill... Just like bringing a speedlite 580ex II to a small party with a room twice the size of your average storeroom...there are the rare few who knows what they are doing. but i wont deny a large majority of my counterparts are doing what u say.
:dunno: what can we do? rich parents
Let's face it: they love the idea of flaunting their dslr, with those kit lens that even the cheapest lens that's not a kit can do a lot better (for canon ppl its the 50mm f1.8) , but they hate quick access camera bags... they love handbags, etc...yes, i agree that the camera should be where it is most accessible (not assessible btw
Anyway, there is always an option of quick-access bag, right? Or are you implying that we should all ditch our bag so that we'll be ready for the "moment"? no, right?
Moreover, i was saying why can't they put it in the bag? i was referencing to xtemujin's post..
i just don't like the fact that DSLR, a tool for photographers, both pros and hobbyist, is used as a fashion accessory; that is the thing that i really hate about it.. being a fashion accessory.. so degrading, man.. some people buy DSLR just for the sake of fashion..
heyyyyy canon kit lens is good ok. decently sharp, got IS, what more to expect? only problem i have with it is that its slow, but the kit lens really taught me alot, i wouldnt say i've used it to the max of my ability, but at least i can justify my upgrade because i know what i want.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/iambasil/5151067541/in/photostream/
kit lens
Honestly I would give up IS for a big arpeture... just personal preference. That's why I got the 50mm f1.4 usmheyyyyy canon kit lens is good ok. decently sharp, got IS, what more to expect? only problem i have with it is that its slow, but the kit lens really taught me alot, i wouldnt say i've used it to the max of my ability, but at least i can justify my upgrade because i know what i want.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/iambasil/5151067541/in/photostream/
kit lens
Similar threads
