hi all, 1st post here
Just curious, is there a specific type of photos these brands are better at?
Like maybe either one brand is better at taking landscape? or Indoor? or wildlife?
Pretty noob here but interested to learn more from ur experience.
hi all, 1st post here
Just curious, is there a specific type of photos these brands are better at?
Like maybe either one brand is better at taking landscape? or Indoor? or wildlife?
Pretty noob here but interested to learn more from ur experience.
Just curious, is there a specific type of photos these brands are better at?
I have personally heard from 2 professional photographer say that they prefer nikon because it gives warmer skin tones in people portraits. That's a personal preference.
Some say canon makes better landscapes because it gives more neutral colors
This nikon/canon debate have been going on for decades.
I personally don't like warm skin tones in Asian skin because it makes us look too yellowish. I like a neutral skin tone
however with today's technology, all there can be change via controlling the white balance or thru post processing
If talking about skin tones in Jpeg out of cam, nothing beats Fuji S series DSLRs... S5pro S3pro and S2pro... :thumbsup:
Naaah, I prefer the A900 skin tones.
Nah, I prefer Zeiss lens on Canon camera for skin tones
Naaah, I prefer the A900 skin tones.
Nah, I prefer Zeiss lens on Canon camera for skin tones
Naaah, I prefer Zeiss autofocus lens on A900 for skin tones.
So you see TS... there is no best. Everyone's best is different.