D dslrnikon New Member Jul 13, 2009 69 0 0 Jul 28, 2009 #1 Hi All, Which would you suggest for nikon D300? In terms of performance. using for weddings, events etc (Low Light settings) Many thanks.
Hi All, Which would you suggest for nikon D300? In terms of performance. using for weddings, events etc (Low Light settings) Many thanks.
W welisha New Member Jun 25, 2009 513 0 0 welisha.multiply.com Jul 28, 2009 #3 AFS according to review is slower in AF, but some reviewer mentioned that AFD is a yesterday thing. Hmmm maybe it depends on wat u r looking for also taking into the price difference between this 2. Last edited: Jul 28, 2009
AFS according to review is slower in AF, but some reviewer mentioned that AFD is a yesterday thing. Hmmm maybe it depends on wat u r looking for also taking into the price difference between this 2.
H huggable Senior Member Nov 2, 2004 3,702 0 36 East side Jul 28, 2009 #4 I'd just go for the AFD, since the D300 can AF on it.
X xwing76 Member Jul 10, 2005 277 0 16 Jul 28, 2009 #5 I don't have the AFS version but I have the d300 and the AFD... Speed, sharpness is good enough for me! I wouldn't even think of getting the AFS version..
I don't have the AFS version but I have the d300 and the AFD... Speed, sharpness is good enough for me! I wouldn't even think of getting the AFS version..
M mikha Deregistered Jul 14, 2008 264 0 16 Earth Jul 28, 2009 #6 i will suggest for AFD, since u r using D300. does it easy to use prime on weddings or events? Last edited: Jul 28, 2009
Z ZeroDivine Senior Member Sep 5, 2004 2,156 4 38 andritei.zenfolio.com Jul 28, 2009 #7 reading the comparison, the difference is not that obvious for me to change from the AF-D to AF-s
B Blur Shadow Senior Member Sep 17, 2005 4,878 4 0 Jul 28, 2009 #8 If you don't know, the best way is to try them both. Borrow/rent. That's what I always say.