Deadpoet shoots only girls what, so he is an "artist".
My point is, the reason why some many people are dissing Ombre is because his formula is something new to them and goes against what they have learnt and have been practising.
The detractors, generally offer two main points of argument. One is summarised by Nightmare86, as "impractical". The other is headed by Deadpoet as "don't get your dirty maths into my art" or something.
There will always be different types of people, like those personality tests eg MBTI show. The "Just wing it" types and those who seek to be properly prepared and less willing to improvise. Can Ombre do a post on the various personalities of people and how it translates into photograhic styles and habits?
Might be a little blatant/irrelevant, but there's this quote about truth.
All truth goes through three phases. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self evident.
Although we're not talking about truth here, but just a way of doing things.
Agreed, a narrowly skilled engineer won't be a good photographer. But no one ever said an artistic photographer can't be a skilled engineer. Why not have both? Technically you now have a way to confirm your experience.
I can fully understand the "don't get your dirty maths into my art". It always happens. The never ending argument about how dance is not about atheletics, how music isn't about dexterity, etc etc. Its very hard to find agreement no doubt. But Deadpoet crossed a line to say that those who use formulas will never grow as a photographer. There I disagree.
As for "impractical"... I don't entirely see why. If you put these variables into an excel worksheet. (10 minutes max), and play around with the inputs (1 minute), you have your figures in 11 minutes. Free.
If formulas are seriously impractical to photography, I don't see how clubsnapping is practical. They don't help you get the photos, but they serve some uses.
I'm wondering if those against the formulas do use focal length calculators or DOF calculators online? Or perhaps you didn't, and eventually learnt that the lens you bought didn't serve your ideals. Lens reviews and all those MTF figures? Don't like them? If you don't put a number to these things, how sharp is sharp really? As long as its decently sharp, your human eyes can easily translate the visual information to 'fill in the blanks'. I don't think most people can tell the sharpness apart from 2 almost equally good lens. Its just a placebo effect after reading the lens reviews, or other favoritism. The mechanism is just not in your human eyes.
About the personality testing... its entirely possible. Then it will be even more 'science'. Imagine if you had the time and resource to personality test every photographer, you can actually predict what pictures they will take
, just by giving them the personality test (a formula in its own right). Social science, is unfortunately, a little more absurd to the public than conventional science. But don't count on me to do it haha.
Here's one theory though, its Freud's theory if you guys have read about this 'weird' psychologist. Summarized and applied version: Sometimes when someone present a work as 'art' (positive), he may actually be habouring thoughts about the disdainful aspects of it. This is called sublimation, and is a defense against anxiety. (eg. if someone is addicted to sex, and feels anxious about his behaviour, he will do nude photography/drawings and pass it off as 'art'). Its only a hypothesis, but a well debated one.