M1 wireless b band is everyhwere at $22/month
- Thread starter Yappy
- Start date
- Status
Er, different leh. GSM vs WiFi.
Only if you are lucky enough to live (or work or study or whatever) near those hotspots then can get the free wireless.
GSM coverage definitely better.
Let's wait for more announcements first.
Must we pre-register at icell in order to qualify for free access?
I thought just go to any hotspot, connect to their access point and sign up online on the spot?
I thought just go to any hotspot, connect to their access point and sign up online on the spot?
must pre register.
wireless@sg is free but might not be reliable. if network down and u need to upload something impt to client or something, u LL have nobody to complain to...haha
wireless@sg is free but might not be reliable. if network down and u need to upload something impt to client or something, u LL have nobody to complain to...haha
You can try registering @ Mcd loh.
wireless@sg first screen will ask you for user id and password... how to register?
Looks cool. No contract somemore!
Very tempting to try it out... but I'm hoping for something I can connect to my PDA instead of a lappy. I dun see a CF card option in the offer. :cry:
Better still if have miniSD version... then my HP6818 can convert to skype + GSM.
M1 is going BIG! BIG ADVERT in today's paper!!! read on!
Any one read the M1 Broadband terms and conditions ?
http://www.m1.com.sg/broadband/m1bb.htm
The service dun support of VOIP and cap to 2 Gig bytes per month
http://www.m1.com.sg/broadband/m1bb.htm
The service dun support of VOIP and cap to 2 Gig bytes per month
coupled with wireless@sg I dun see much of a problem overcoming this limitation. But it's a hassle tho.
If there is a cap of 2 Gigs, how could they publishes as unlimited broadband ?
They should publishes as 2 gigs of bandwidth instead. It is quite misleading.
They should publishes as 2 gigs of bandwidth instead. It is quite misleading.
Ya, just upgraded to the 38 dollars plan. More speed, less priced then my previous Sunsurf Unlimited.
The speed is stable. I use skype for video conferencing on it. what do you think?
(I surf ON THE BUS AND MRT, but sometimes signal weak may d/c, but then again, it works on a moving vehicle. What to complain?)
(I surf ON THE BUS AND MRT, but sometimes signal weak may d/c, but then again, it works on a moving vehicle. What to complain?)
i am now using 384K as i typed..webpage opening are begining to slow.. guess the slash in prices may have invited more users on the network. :sweat:
How come our Business practise here are so one-sided one? how to complete with global players?
T&Cs written are lop-sided and unacceptable, in fact all Service Providers here are too kiasu.. this type of Business practise and mentality will not win us big business.
This is so sad, Business Managers are being told how to run a business by lawyers, when the lawyers should be taking instructions from business how to write T&Cs that will aid more business, we have a long way to go to really be able to complete on the world stage.
T&Cs should be written which are mutually unbiased, that is the way to get MNCs business. If Service Provider wants not to be liable for poor performance then the customer must also want Service Porovider to not charge for those period that the network is under performing.
How can you have such a clause in item 10 and 11, totally unacceptable. If this Service Provider wants to be treated like small time player then it will be a small time player.
../azul123
T&Cs written are lop-sided and unacceptable, in fact all Service Providers here are too kiasu.. this type of Business practise and mentality will not win us big business.
This is so sad, Business Managers are being told how to run a business by lawyers, when the lawyers should be taking instructions from business how to write T&Cs that will aid more business, we have a long way to go to really be able to complete on the world stage.
T&Cs should be written which are mutually unbiased, that is the way to get MNCs business. If Service Provider wants not to be liable for poor performance then the customer must also want Service Porovider to not charge for those period that the network is under performing.
How can you have such a clause in item 10 and 11, totally unacceptable. If this Service Provider wants to be treated like small time player then it will be a small time player.
../azul123
to be able compete with global players at least we need to speak proper english. And yes, it's COMPETE, not COMPLETE
- Status
Similar threads
