Ya but for some of Streetshooter's shots its also done secretly ie shooting from the hip - just that its not that kind of boliao shots of gals like those u find in sggals
Is there a law against this?
- Thread starter FLiNcHY
- Start date
- Status
Ya but for some of Streetshooter's shots its also done secretly ie shooting from the hip - just that its not that kind of boliao shots of gals like those u find in sggals
This is about the only section of the Penal Code which can be broadly interpreted to mean that it is against the law to take pictures of pretty girls in public. But only if the girl is annoyed by the action.
i don't think he uses his palms to hide his cam in case the subject sees him
I don't he secretly puts his camera under the table to hide it from view while taking shots does he?
ya their photos badly underexposed n somemore not in position man!
u never say i also dunno sggirls hav spread that far liao. they hav really gone too far liao this time. :angry:
Wah, you have access to penal code har?
Actually, everyone also have lar....
http://agcvldb4.agc.gov.sg/
Interesting that a search for "invasion of privacy" throws up NOTHING. I guess otherwise government cannot function liaw... :devil:
if the end result is the same(shot taken of pretty gal without her knowing) is there a difference?
* togu wonders why someone with a warrant card don't know how to deal with such unpleasant issues....
I think it's all a matter of the places and the type of photo.
First of all, you friends are in a PUBLIC places, hence there isn't much of privacy to talk about.
Chapter 338,
Meaning of obscene
3. For the purposes of this Act, a publication is obscene if its effect or (where the publication comprises 2 or more distinct parts or items) the effect of any one of its parts or items is, if taken as a whole, such as to tend to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely, having regard to all relevant circumstances, to read, see or hear the matter contained or embodied in it.
Secondly, as the pictures are of fully clothed persons, it cannot be categorised as obscene publication or material which might be offending in any way. Plus, there is no CRIMINAL forces involved in the process of the phototaking. Nor any purpose intention to conceal the camera. Hence, if you wanna take this to court, i'm afraid there isn't really much of a case.
In dealing with such matters, it should be more of civil reasoning than legal actions. You should approach the persons involved there and then and sort things out.
Imagine if they were really taken to court. They could argue that they were snapping pictures of the place and these women just happens to walk by. It's a situation impossible to define on the lines of legality.
Just my 2 cents worth, no offences i hope.
First of all, you friends are in a PUBLIC places, hence there isn't much of privacy to talk about.
Chapter 338,
Meaning of obscene
3. For the purposes of this Act, a publication is obscene if its effect or (where the publication comprises 2 or more distinct parts or items) the effect of any one of its parts or items is, if taken as a whole, such as to tend to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely, having regard to all relevant circumstances, to read, see or hear the matter contained or embodied in it.
Secondly, as the pictures are of fully clothed persons, it cannot be categorised as obscene publication or material which might be offending in any way. Plus, there is no CRIMINAL forces involved in the process of the phototaking. Nor any purpose intention to conceal the camera. Hence, if you wanna take this to court, i'm afraid there isn't really much of a case.
In dealing with such matters, it should be more of civil reasoning than legal actions. You should approach the persons involved there and then and sort things out.
Imagine if they were really taken to court. They could argue that they were snapping pictures of the place and these women just happens to walk by. It's a situation impossible to define on the lines of legality.
Just my 2 cents worth, no offences i hope.
so whats the diff between
and
Don't come and tell me its the same and that the person who shot the first pic did nothing wrong
* togu clap clap clap
Personally, I will take out my MRT card, walk up, give a smile, and asked what are they shooting. If it ends up to be nasty, I will approached help from the floor manager.
Originally posted by FLiNcHY
so whats the diff between
and
the first one says
"Error: Unable to perform query: kill 133964 :Unknown thread id: 133964 "
the second one is a picture of a woman.
Originally posted by FLiNcHY
so whats the diff between
and
wah...difference a lot siah...
@flinchy
i think u can try to knockdown the sggirls or the photoforum liao...
preciselyOriginally posted by kindred
wah...difference a lot siah...
@flinchy
i think u can try to knockdown the sggirls or the photoforum liao...
- Status
Similar threads
