Hmm, but for this, I think the processing part makes a difference even though sensors might be the same
I need some opinions...
- Thread starter HelloNiHao
- Start date
Hmm, but for this, I think the processing part makes a difference even though sensors might be the same
Hmm, but for this, I think the processing part makes a difference even though sensors might be the same
Not as much as you may think. Especially if you shoot RAW.
For some of your pics, I find the noise quite acceptable. And with a NR software like noise ninja, you can reduce the noise drastically. And on top of that, shoot in RAW and do PP. If you still cannot live with that, and must shoot in ambient light, FF is the only way to go. It has nothing to do with whether you are a pro or not. But it depends on what you can or cannot live with.
since when must have skill to justify FF?
I thought it was only whether or not one had enough $$ ?
like dat I'll never be able to get FF, coz no skill.... :bsmilie:
I thought it was only whether or not one had enough $$ ?
like dat I'll never be able to get FF, coz no skill.... :bsmilie:
Hi everyone. these are the photos: i know the composition is not good at all but its purpose is to show the noise. peace.
^1/40, f/1.8, +0.7, iso 3200.
sorry for the huge pictures.
This picture looks like there is sufficient ambient lighting.
1/40, f/1.8, ISO3200? Sounds pretty extreme. Unless the real situation was much darker...:think:
If you are going to shoot another event, why don't you rent a FF-body camera, and get a similar fast lens for both your Sony and the rented body. Also, rent a flash at the same time for your Sony and see if it is worth getting it full-time. Then compare if you are happy with the outcome.
Only then will you know if you really need a new body or not.
Just my 2 cents.
Cheers!
Only then will you know if you really need a new body or not.
Just my 2 cents.
Cheers!
Hmm... yeah I think I should be trying out a flash for my next event shoot. For 5d classic, I am not really interested because it's quite old already but i am not saying that the photos would suck but i would really want something more advanced.
Yes. I used prime lens for those 3 photos of mine. Yeah, I will be using a flash for my next event. Hmm, I ain't interested in PnS because it's too small already, and I prefer looking through the viewfinder.
Hmm.. okay. thanks for the suggestion! (using a CCD sensor.
) TS, if you like to view the pic at this size, it's inevitable you spot noise...but in your photos, I think the noise is acceptable and no need to nit pick over it...:dunno:
why not concentrate on the details rather than noise?
Hmm... okay.... Thanks for your reply.
Not really.... but I would wait for its replacement to come out before getting it. And the lack of VR really discourages me to not get it.. although the iso performance is pretty good..
Hmm okay. I use Aperture actually. But the pics I have uploaded aren't PP-ed, to show the noise.
ok, thanks for ur opinion. aiya, i dunwan to be seen as those people holding cameras and don't even know how to take a photo... lol..
The real situation was much darker. It appears brighter because I overexposed it.
the noise isn't obvious but the picture is very grainy, I feel.
I think I now know what you need...it's either Nikon D3x or Canon 1D Mk IV.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkg7pAxi4gE
No, he would need a D3S, not the X. The D3X uses the same sensor as the Sony A900, and is not a high ISO body.
It's just what I felt lah... I ain't a professional anw...
there are loads of non-professionals using both cameras or their earlier incarnations.
:angel:
there are loads of non-professionals using both cameras or their earlier incarnations.
True.... but I am not as rich as them lah. :bsmilie:
Hmm... but the build quality is different... I would seriously want something that's freaking big.
Similar threads
