- Thread starter sprintist
- Start date

- Status
- Not open for further replies.

Rate of return to equity holders = 100,000/400,000 = 25%

Notice here that the rate of return to equity to equity holders is actually 25% instead of the 10% return on assets. This is because of leverage used in this instance i.e. the equity holders took up debt to invest more and earn more returns.

10% return on assets of $1,000,000 = $100,000

Rate of return to equity holders = 100,000/400,000 = 25%

Notice here that the rate of return to equity to equity holders is actually 25% instead of the 10% return on assets. This is because of leverage used in this instance i.e. the equity holders took up debt to invest more and earn more returns.

Rate of return to equity holders = 100,000/400,000 = 25%

Notice here that the rate of return to equity to equity holders is actually 25% instead of the 10% return on assets. This is because of leverage used in this instance i.e. the equity holders took up debt to invest more and earn more returns.

But something is missing.

ROE is normally calculated based on Net Income/Total equity. As with ROA is Net Income/Total Assets.

In this case, I will use the DuPont: ROE=ROA x Equity Mulitiplier = ROA x (1+Debt-Equity Ratio).

Unless Sprintist, you are asking about MM theory, then it is a whole new ball game.

no wonder im into engineering... :bsmilie:

and no wonder i can't make big bucks as well

and no wonder i can't make big bucks as well

But something is missing.

ROE is normally calculated based on Net Income/Total equity. As with ROA is Net Income/Total Assets.

In this case, I will use the DuPont: ROE=ROA x Equity Mulitiplier = ROA x (1+Debt-Equity Ratio).

Unless Sprintist, you are asking about MM theory, then it is a whole new ball game.

cos this isn't return on equity but rather, the rate of return on equity

i'm bad with numbers too!

nope its not exactly the MM theory, its just about weight average cost of capital, WACC. in this the return on asset is the WACC.

cos this isn't return on equity but rather, the rate of return on equity

nope its not exactly the MM theory, its just about weight average cost of capital, WACC. in this the return on asset is the WACC.

cos this isn't return on equity but rather, the rate of return on equity

*I seriously hated Financial Ratios when studying corp fin.*

Have no real clue but as gotta wait up for someone, let me be helpless and try some geek speak.....;p So potential functions you could use in Excel and will need to calculate a schedule as well.....

IRR

XIRR

MIRR

IRR

XIRR

MIRR

hrm, but don't firms pay off the interest on their debts first, before passing on returns to equity holders?

that is the reason why i asked for that additional information, along with tax rates.

unless of course, you assume that debt is interest-free, and there are no taxes on revenue..

that is the reason why i asked for that additional information, along with tax rates.

unless of course, you assume that debt is interest-free, and there are no taxes on revenue..

You can probably assume the tax and interest already taken care in the computation for RoA so no diff. kcf2's answer shd be correct

i'll now show it here maybe someone can help explain why

Therefore, given WACC is 10%, it must be that the cost of debt is: WACC/(D/E ratio), and the cost of equity must be: WACC x (D/E ratio). Therefore:

cost of debt = 0.10/1.5 = 0.0666 = 6.66%

cost of equity = 0.10 x 1.5 = 0.15 = 15% (available rate of return to equity holders).

that was what i would have done too but the answer used the debt/equity ratio.

i'll now show it here maybe someone can help explain why

**Debt/Equity ratio = $600,000/$400,000 = 1.5**

Therefore, given WACC is 10%, it must be that the cost of debt is: WACC/(D/E ratio), and the cost of equity must be: WACC x (D/E ratio). Therefore:

cost of debt = 0.10/1.5 = 0.0666 = 6.66%

cost of equity = 0.10 x 1.5 = 0.15 = 15% (available rate of return to equity holders).

i'll now show it here maybe someone can help explain why

Therefore, given WACC is 10%, it must be that the cost of debt is: WACC/(D/E ratio), and the cost of equity must be: WACC x (D/E ratio). Therefore:

cost of debt = 0.10/1.5 = 0.0666 = 6.66%

cost of equity = 0.10 x 1.5 = 0.15 = 15% (available rate of return to equity holders).

(1) Assets = $1,000,000 which is financed by:-

Debt = $600,000

Equity = $400,000

(2) Return on assets = $100,000 (which is another word for saying return on total capital)

Capital as defined in financial terms (and not in layman's language) means Debt + Equity

(3) In other words, the question tells you that your WACC is 10%.

(4) You are now required to solve for the return on equity (or the question could also ask you to solve for the return on debt).

The formula for WACC is:-

WACC = [cost of debt x (debt/(debt + equity))] + [cost of equity x (equity/(debt + equity))]

Therefore,

Cost of Equity = WACC / (equity/debt) = 10% / 0.6667 = 15% and

Cost of Debt = WACC / (debt/equity) = 10% / 1.5 = 6.6667%

To cross-check your answers above:-

Total return = (return on debt x debt) + (return on equity x equity)

= (6.6667% x $600,000) + (15% x $400,000)

= $100,000

This is a question on how to calculate WACC. Based on the clues given in the question:-

(1) Assets = $1,000,000 which is financed by:-

Debt = $600,000

Equity = $400,000

(2) Return on assets = $100,000 (which is another word for saying return on total capital)

Capital as defined in financial terms (and not in layman's language) means Debt + Equity

(3) In other words, the question tells you that your WACC is 10%.

(4) You are now required to solve for the return on equity (or the question could also ask you to solve for the return on debt).

The formula for WACC is:-

WACC = [cost of debt x (debt/(debt + equity))] + [cost of equity x (equity/(debt + equity))]

Therefore,

Cost of Equity = WACC / (equity/debt) = 10% / 0.6667 = 15% and

Cost of Debt = WACC / (debt/equity) = 10% / 1.5 = 6.6667%

To cross-check your answers above:-

Total return = (return on debt x debt) + (return on equity x equity)

= (6.6667% x $600,000) + (15% x $400,000)

= $100,000

(1) Assets = $1,000,000 which is financed by:-

Debt = $600,000

Equity = $400,000

(2) Return on assets = $100,000 (which is another word for saying return on total capital)

Capital as defined in financial terms (and not in layman's language) means Debt + Equity

(3) In other words, the question tells you that your WACC is 10%.

(4) You are now required to solve for the return on equity (or the question could also ask you to solve for the return on debt).

The formula for WACC is:-

WACC = [cost of debt x (debt/(debt + equity))] + [cost of equity x (equity/(debt + equity))]

Therefore,

Cost of Equity = WACC / (equity/debt) = 10% / 0.6667 = 15% and

Cost of Debt = WACC / (debt/equity) = 10% / 1.5 = 6.6667%

To cross-check your answers above:-

Total return = (return on debt x debt) + (return on equity x equity)

= (6.6667% x $600,000) + (15% x $400,000)

= $100,000

thanks for your reply and the further cross checking which my answer also did so.

pardon me but i have been trying to rearrange the formula since yesterday but i couldnt derive to simply Cost of Equity = WACC / (equity/debt)

the furthest i could get was Cost of Equity = [ WACC.(debt+equity) - cost of debt.Debt)] / [Equity]

that was what made me stuck..am i missing out any assumptions? hope you can show me the derivation if possible. Thanks!

thanks for your reply and the further cross checking which my answer also did so.

pardon me but i have been trying to rearrange the formula since yesterday but i couldnt derive to simply Cost of Equity = WACC / (equity/debt)

the furthest i could get was Cost of Equity = [ WACC.(debt+equity) - cost of debt.Debt)] / [Equity]

that was what made me stuck..am i missing out any assumptions? hope you can show me the derivation if possible. Thanks!

pardon me but i have been trying to rearrange the formula since yesterday but i couldnt derive to simply Cost of Equity = WACC / (equity/debt)

the furthest i could get was Cost of Equity = [ WACC.(debt+equity) - cost of debt.Debt)] / [Equity]

that was what made me stuck..am i missing out any assumptions? hope you can show me the derivation if possible. Thanks!

- Status
- Not open for further replies.