Does brand loyalty affect your perception of other brands?

How does brand loyalty affect your perception of other brands?


Results are only viewable after voting.

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Midnight

Guest
#1
Where do you fit in on this scale?
 

tsdh

New Member
Jul 8, 2002
340
0
0
Singapore
Visit site
#3
It's a definitely no for me...I'm not loyal to the brand name, blindy that is! :)
Each piece of equipment has its own merit regardless of the brand, if I still can use it as my tools to create the picture I want, then I will use it.
 

Zerstorer

Senior Member
Jul 8, 2002
3,437
0
0
#5
Originally posted by mpenza
I'm not "brand loyal" but I do try to correct wrong perceptions/incorrect information.
Ditto.

All products are just tools meant to serve you. Though you may have faith in a manufacturer due to past experience, each new product deserves to be evaluated on its own merit.

It applys to all things.
 

tomshen

Senior Member
Feb 20, 2002
3,644
0
36
Singapore
#6
Definitely NO. I buy things value for money. But my view on value may change over time;)
 

Jun 27, 2002
3,802
0
0
here
www.9frames.com
#7
partically brand loyal. From certain brands, oyu have some sort of self assurance that it will live up to a certain performance. I'm talking aobut everything, including MacDonalds.:D
 

Feb 3, 2002
1,741
0
0
Singapore
#9
I wouldn't term it as brand loyalty. It's just that a particular brand (e.g. fujifilm) implements certain features in their digicam (e.g. superb movie mode) which appeal to me.

Thus, in a way, certain considerations which they make in their design (which possibly evolves into their culture) coincide with what I look out for.
 

SNAG

Senior Member
Jun 14, 2002
1,644
0
36
33
Visit site
#10
Originally posted by imaginary_number
I wouldn't term it as brand loyalty. It's just that a particular brand (e.g. fujifilm) implements certain features in their digicam (e.g. superb movie mode) which appeal to me.

Thus, in a way, certain considerations which they make in their design (which possibly evolves into their culture) coincide with what I look out for.
I agree with your point.
Normally, I'll narrow my search down to the specific models, and then I will do a comparison:

What extra features that it has that I need?? (Normally, people just rush to get the flagship model, only to realise that they do not use all those functions in it....

Is it worth it to pay extra for this model?
(PS: Is this considered as a "cost-benefit analysis"?)

But many other issues cloud one's purchasing decision....
This is where marketing skills pop in....
They try to create a differentiated product away from the rivals, so as to increase their sales. Branding, packaging and design also plays a part in it as well.

For me, I sometimes get swayed by brand name...
I plonked my money to get a Nikon without even looking at the other brands... :D :D
 

Jed

Senior Member
Jan 19, 2002
3,911
0
0
UK
Visit site
#11
Originally posted by SNAG
For me, I sometimes get swayed by brand name...
I plonked my money to get a Nikon without even looking at the other brands... :D :D
I suspect you're not alone and lots of people do too, just that you're honest enough to admit it. Look at the poll results, the option with a whopping 100% more votes (as of this writing) than any other option was an honest evaluation of each piece of equipment regardless of brand.

Right.
 

SNAG

Senior Member
Jun 14, 2002
1,644
0
36
33
Visit site
#12
Originally posted by Jed


I suspect you're not alone and lots of people do too, just that you're honest enough to admit it. Look at the poll results, the option with a whopping 100% more votes (as of this writing) than any other option was an honest evaluation of each piece of equipment regardless of brand.

Right.
One of the reasons that I got Nikon at that time was that it seemingly seemed that most professionals (in my utmost myopic newbie sense :angel: ) relied on Nikon for professional shooting > it led to me thinking that Nikon was the best, and I should pay the extra premium to get a Nikon, and have access to those legendary Nikkors... which are out of my reach. How ironic.

But this was not definitely the case.
Soon, I realised that there are a significant amount of shooters shooting on other brands like Canon, Leica etc...

And the first thing that I learnt from Clubsnap was that the main decisive factor that identifies you as a good photographer is not your assemble of equipment, it's your skills.

Take me for instance: I got a relatively good camera, but I feel that the shots I take are sub-standard... :)

PS: I like your quote...
 

tsdh

New Member
Jul 8, 2002
340
0
0
Singapore
Visit site
#13
Originally posted by Jed

I suspect you're not alone and lots of people do too, just that you're honest enough to admit it. Look at the poll results, the option with a whopping 100% more votes (as of this writing) than any other option was an honest evaluation of each piece of equipment regardless of brand.
Right.
Finally Jed come with an honest opinion :)
Yes, indeed many people biased toward brand.
e.g.: if you're given a choice to purchase an original Nikon/Canon and a third party, both render the same quality and same price, which one you choose?

If a group of amateurs gather, and somebody join them carrying a Leica then another guy with old Nikkormat. Tell me which one will get more attention and praise, even without looking at their result?

Some macro photographer swear by their Nikkor 105/2.8 Micro, can they distinguish the result from the one taken with Sigma 105/2.8 EX ?

well Jed, it is very difficult to be 100% unbiased by brand.
 

tomshen

Senior Member
Feb 20, 2002
3,644
0
36
Singapore
#14
Once a photograher comes to a certain level, he would be nitty picky on every single detail. I admit that if i have no problem with my finance, I would buy the BEST quality. But usually I have constraints on my cash flow, a tradeoff between value and cost is unavoidable. So far I still think it is my vision and skill that limit the quality of my shots, in 99% of time:D
 

kh_drew

New Member
Aug 5, 2002
293
0
0
45
Singapore
Visit site
#15
I'm a Nikon user and it's almost be default because I inherited the FE and some good primes from my uncle who gave up photography. Ever since then I've shot exclusively with the set-up I got and once effort and (mostly) money is spent to build up a system that I was comfortable with, I never really thought about switching to other brands. Frankly, if my uncle had given my a Canon or other brands, I would be firing away with USM lenses instead of not being able to afford the expensive AF-S Nikkors. Well, anyway, I'm happy with what I have now and will continue in getting stuff for Nikon.

Note: I would consider third party stuff for my system if the price/quality ratio is right. I mean, $800 for Tokina 28-80 and $3000 for Nikkor 28-70....I don't think the quality difference is 3x.

andrew
 

ed9119

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 11, 2002
11,014
38
48
56
Singapore
www.walkeast.com
#16
I use the EOS and Contax G amongst other cameras. Its not brand loyalty but the fact that its costly switching systems. What a trap. If only the industry could adopt a universal lens mount....

Easiest stuff to switch are fixed lens cameras like Canonet, Fuji rangefinders, P&Ss etc etc as they dont come with 'baggage'

ed
 

Fundee

New Member
Jan 18, 2002
727
0
0
UP NORTH
Visit site
#17
Originally posted by SNAG

For me, I sometimes get swayed by brand name...
I plonked my money to get a Nikon without even looking at the other brands... :D :D
the same for me but for quite different reason...
firstly its becoz my mentor & his pool of gang use it although at that time camera was very expensive. Its batterd but still working...the resale value is good as i was thinking of upgrading as time goes by...i will only buy what i need irregardless of brand name.



good to have.........wanna buy ???
must have..............wanna buy ???
priority ???
 

Acieed

New Member
Sep 11, 2002
372
0
0
-
www.anduin.net
#18
Nowadays, parts are all manufactured in different places. Many are even designed and manufactured by OEM.

Think only things that brand can guarantee now is just service quality, quality control (deteoriating) and after-sales support guarantee (software upgrade, supplies, helpline etc.).
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom