N-user said:Alamak.... just when I was about to get it.... OOF problem, then the initial oil/dust problem... how like that???
Jut get if, AF is probably just me
N-user said:Alamak.... just when I was about to get it.... OOF problem, then the initial oil/dust problem... how like that???
Pinoy said:The D700 has that Auto Focus Mode Selector that allows the photog to easily switch from Dynamic to Single AF. How do we do this now with the D600? Have you figured out a way to easily do this?
PS: please don't tell me to RTFM hehe.
I am curious as to why u would wan to use dynamc area af...
Alamak.... just when I was about to get it.... OOF problem, then the initial oil/dust problem... how like that???
Yes.Maybe the photographer is expecting movement by the subject?
Yes.
Coming from 5D Mk2 (and Canon 40D before that), I mostly shoot with Single AF (Center) but would sometimes need more (and I know the AF of D600 -- tracking included -- is pretty good). Just wanna know if there's a quicker way of switching in between.
PS: the reference to D700 was made bec I used that for 1+ week before eventually deciding to get the D600.
Thanks. I read Dpreview's review of the D600 for like 3x before deciding to make the switch. Missed the whole point of this completely.Taken from Dpreview....
Nikon's decision to move from a 3-position (single autofocus/continuous autofocus/manual focus) focussing mode switch on the front of the camera, to a new, 2-position (autofocus/manual focus) switch, with a control button. In the new design, with the switch set to 'AF', pressing the button and turning the rear control dials allows you to toggle between single-shot and continuous AF modes. Still with the button held down, you can then use the front dial to cycle among six AF Area modes. This is very simple, very neat, and makes perfect sense from the point of view of unifying form with function.
I used my new D600 for wedding AD assignment last week, it gives me higher chance of OOF during low light than my D700.
Sorry to hear that. May I check how low light is your low light?
I have an example here, where I pushed the camera to the extreme. In the actual scene, it is much darker than what you see in this pic.
Full size JPEG SOOC, all functions in camera, including NR switched OFF. f4, 1/15s, ISO 6400
100% cropped
I am using the image as full size, so that 100% crop is just to show how it looks, which I thought was pretty acceptable. I don't know how other camera may have fared, but this seems good enough, bearing in mind it's at 1/15s @ ISO 6400 already, which is really hitting the max possible for blur free image.
Here's another one
f4, 1/13s, ISO 4000
If your scenerio is darker than these, probably you may want to show us a sample for us to have a better idea. We are all here to share and learn. I like to know how dark you all mean cos my definition of dark may be different.
I use AF-C, dynamic AF 9 points during the couple marching.
The lens is 24f1.4.
ISO1600, f/1.4, 1/100
I didn't use the center point (maybe this is the cause)
Blur Shadow said:Maybe the photographer is expecting movement by the subject?
Jut get if, AF is probably just me
N-user said:Any dust problem as reported??