- Nov 24, 2008
is there any significant difference if just compare these 2 features?
D3 has a better brain, I read its more responsive than D300. However I seen lots of sports photographer using D300 and the 's' club.Interesting. So other than the FX/DX sensor size difference, the capabilities are exactly the same.
For the Professionals, shooting at low light and high ISO performance would be best equipments for them. They ain't so keen to own more DX body than FX.or maybe the motor is more powerful
DX for sports is very practical since it gives you more apparent reach on the tele side
Yes, I am quite sure that D3 is definitely faster on AF-C mode. While it could be subjective in all accounts, I had the liberty to test on my kiddos running around in my home garden while doing candid shots of them using D3s and D700. The D3s subject tracking glue-ed on the kids movements like an eagle eye. The D700 may loose track on some occassion. That is just a personal opinion and that was how it felt when using the different bodies.is there any significant difference if just compare these 2 features?