Cant seem to take short DOF shots w/ A40


Status
Not open for further replies.

thoa_rs

Senior Member
Jan 10, 2003
1,828
0
0
33
Siglap
Visit site
#1
No matter how low the apperture no. i set and how for the background is from the object i just cant seem to achieve a shallow depth of field using my A40 (portraits, flowers, etc). Anybody can help?
 

YSLee

Senior Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,326
1
38
Visit site
#8
denizenx, as usual, please don't go spewing rubbish.

thoa_rs: Shallow depth of field is not possible with consumer DCs.. it is a limitation due to the small CCD. A closeup lens only decreases your minimum focusing range, and allows a larger magnification.
 

mervlam

Senior Member
Apr 26, 2002
2,279
0
0
Visit site
#10
Originally posted by YSLee
denizenx, as usual, please don't go spewing rubbish.

thoa_rs: Shallow depth of field is not possible with consumer DCs.. it is a limitation due to the small CCD. A closeup lens only decreases your minimum focusing range, and allows a larger magnification.
YSLee, don't be rude.

But anyway, denizenx, you are wrong, big time!

Small CCDs don't allow a good shallow depth of field. And the Hoya closeup lens are for macrophotography only.
 

mervlam

Senior Member
Apr 26, 2002
2,279
0
0
Visit site
#11
Originally posted by FLiNcHY
i thought the first flower shot was nice

nice DOF too
nah... the DOF is not shallow enough to my liking. That's the in-built limitation of digicams. The background still looks distracting.
 

thoa_rs

Senior Member
Jan 10, 2003
1,828
0
0
33
Siglap
Visit site
#12
Originally posted by mervlam


nah... the DOF is not shallow enough to my liking. That's the in-built limitation of digicams. The background still looks distracting.
couldn't really get the flower sharp enough cos it was very windy... will try again soon.
any tips on how to achieve shorter dof for portrait shots?
 

binbeto

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2002
2,312
0
0
43
Behind a lens
www.pbase.com
#13
Originally posted by thoa_rs


couldn't really get the flower sharp enough cos it was very windy... will try again soon.
any tips on how to achieve shorter dof for portrait shots?
Try shooting at the longest zoom. But I think the aperture will decrease as you zoom.
 

thoa_rs

Senior Member
Jan 10, 2003
1,828
0
0
33
Siglap
Visit site
#14
Originally posted by binbeto


Try shooting at the longest zoom. But I think the aperture will decrease as you zoom.
yeah i've been doing that, the dof decreases that way.
 

denizenx

Senior Member
Feb 1, 2002
4,058
0
0
41
L2TPYSG
Visit site
#15
Originally posted by mervlam


YSLee, don't be rude.

But anyway, denizenx, you are wrong, big time!

Small CCDs don't allow a good shallow depth of field. And the Hoya closeup lens are for macrophotography only.
wow how did I miss this... no wonder so much animosity from yslee... ho well

well I did ask him if he was shooting purely flowers and stuff..
the +2 +4 do kill DOF a lot, since they limit image depth..
and, sigh, I was trying to be application specific... from my experience with a +4 on a 75-300mm film and digital 38-380mm, it fits the bill quite well...
 

mervlam

Senior Member
Apr 26, 2002
2,279
0
0
Visit site
#16
Originally posted by denizenx


wow how did I miss this... no wonder so much animosity from yslee... ho well

well I did ask him if he was shooting purely flowers and stuff..
the +2 +4 do kill DOF a lot, since they limit image depth..
and, sigh, I was trying to be application specific... from my experience with a +4 on a 75-300mm film and digital 38-380mm, it fits the bill quite well...
he asked about portraits as well. how can you miss that?
 

denizenx

Senior Member
Feb 1, 2002
4,058
0
0
41
L2TPYSG
Visit site
#17
hmm this I tried when I got home...
a tired n pissed me..
38mm +4 c2100uz on tripod,
so the face a bit big... dunno if +2 is as powerful... I dun have it..
I know the nose is not fully in focus either... but it illustrates the point...
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom