As above, anybody knows? Coz got a photo by a friend, says he took the picture, but it look suspicious...
As above, anybody knows? Coz got a photo by a friend, says he took the picture, but it look suspicious...
As above, anybody knows? Coz got a photo by a friend, says he took the picture, but it look suspicious...
Focal length is 18 mm sia :bsmilie:
Your friend is superman can fly in air while taking pic?
does these has anything to do with Nikon?
As above, anybody knows? Coz got a photo by a friend, says he took the picture, but it look suspicious...
it was, at the time I post post#7.No? What does it have to do with Nikon? It's not the Nikon sub-forum leh.. ;p
in my PC, ctrl right click will pop out dictionaryin vista you just need to right click
And if Sony produces such noisy ISO100 image, there is no chance they can ever compete with Nikon and Canon.
Then Nikon wouldn't compete either since Sony manufactures their sensors.
Highly suspicious, unless he took it with a small H-series, where the real rather than equivalent focal range was indicated, then did heavy tonal adjustments and sharpening in post. That's the only way to get noise like that at ISO 100.
it was, at the time I post post#7.
No.. it says 27mm 135-equivalent focal length. So it's a 1.5x multiplier. ;p The EXIF was from a A350. If he took it with a H series, there is no need to alter the EXIF. ;p
27mm equivalent?? So he shot it with the kit lens at 18mm wide-angle? Would then be 24mm equiv, not 27.
Very suspicious, unless he was sitting in another jet flying next to it.
And the ISO noise looks more like 1600, or very very very heavy PP.
27mm is correct for a 1.5x crop lah.. ;p
Yah.. I think he took someone else's picture and pasted on his existing image.
Anyway, the EXIF time is 6:42am on 9 Aug, I guess the sun is not even out yet.. ;p