i thought there are only photographers and gwc
ask sion to self tfcd and take a couplea out of hot pink bikini shots
ummm i kinda agree with all of the above except the first one. there are freelancers around who aren't managed by agencies.
Just wondering how 1 define oneself as models? Got any paper to prove?:dunno:
i think models ought to have agents. freelancers don't count as true models for me. it's more of a sideline kind of thing. and hence they lack the professionalism.
i think models ought to have agents. freelancers don't count as true models for me. it's more of a sideline kind of thing. and hence they lack the professionalism.
In that case freelancer photographers cannot be called photographers unless they have a studio that they are employed or associated with?
Maybe, freelance makeup artists also cannot be called makeup artists unless they are part of a company?
As for any other freelance jobs. They can't be called that unless they are non-freelance?
You should see things from a bigger angle.
and there are crappy agencies around that hire "models" but these models aren't even professional.
How u define urself as model?
How come no model comes out to reply?
In that case freelancer photographers cannot be called photographers unless they have a studio that they are employed or associated with?
Maybe, freelance makeup artists also cannot be called makeup artists unless they are part of a company?
As for any other freelance jobs. They can't be called that unless they are non-freelance?
You should see things from a bigger angle.
How come no model comes out to reply?
i really don't know where you guys are coming from with the question of models. but to me, modeling is a profession. and like all professions, there needs to be a certain number of entry barriers.
and for me, the barriers are what i've stated.
i take photos. but when people ask me if i'm a photographer, i decline the term and just call myself a photo enthusiast. photographers are way more nobel than i am.
i think you guys are coming from a very general point of view, whereby any one who's willing to be photographed is qualified as a model. and yes, to a very large extent that is true too.
it's just that i wish to define models differently, and more exclusively.
i can't believe what i'm reading, seriously.
and there are crappy agencies around that hire "models" but these models aren't even professional.
No issue, so long as you are aware that your definition is solely yours and yours alone, and may not be in congruence with the ordinary meaning in the English language or that found in dictionaries.
In your case, probably only agency models deserve to be called models and those not signed with agencies are just .... human beings in front of a camera.
this is what i got from dicitonary.com:
5. a person whose profession is posing for artists or photographers.
6. a person employed to wear clothing or pose with a product for purposes of display and advertising.
hmmm. with that, neither of us are wrong lah.