Why do people kept repeating "Its not the equipment but the man behind the cam"?
- Thread starter satan_18349
- Start date
- Status
I don't have the impression that the "it's not the equipment ..." thing comes up everytime. There can be (and are) technical discussions that have their merit. But I do have the impression that many postings a la "I am limited by my current camera, should I upgrade to a Nikanolta Mk5DS3+++ or a Leisselblad XL5/pro" are rather obvious pretexts for "I want to buy myself a new toy".
There's nothing wrong with getting oneself a new toy, but then be honest about it. If not, what's wrong with an answer like "it's not the equipment".
Of course, equipment limitations can be a hindrance in some cases. But looking at the vast majority of photos that people post here, it's clear that equipment is rarely the limiting factor. I also believe that once you understand/can appreciate the usefulness of/need for certain technical specifications, there's little left that would need to be discussed which hasn't been beaten to death elsewhere. It is very revealing if you want to buy a fancy camera because you "need" some high-tech feature, yet you don't really understand what it is.
There's nothing wrong with getting oneself a new toy, but then be honest about it. If not, what's wrong with an answer like "it's not the equipment".
Of course, equipment limitations can be a hindrance in some cases. But looking at the vast majority of photos that people post here, it's clear that equipment is rarely the limiting factor. I also believe that once you understand/can appreciate the usefulness of/need for certain technical specifications, there's little left that would need to be discussed which hasn't been beaten to death elsewhere. It is very revealing if you want to buy a fancy camera because you "need" some high-tech feature, yet you don't really understand what it is.
that's what i think so... to have a good image produce from whatever tools u hold on your hand. but not everyone can do it.
that's what i think so... to have a good image produce from whatever tools u hold on your hand. but not everyone can do it.
i believe we may have some disagreement to the extent of the issue.
wanting the highest and the most expensive model without stating any limitations is rarely the case, or at least hardly as common as those who consider between entry/sub-entry models versus intermediate/semi-professional models without knowing why, how and what will change.
if your question is what's "wrong" with the statement, then there is two way of looking at it,
1. academically: the statement is true as a "most often" situation, but not as an absolute or almost always. also, subject and tools are not as minor as what the statement seem to suggest, despite of user being of a significant factor. limited subject and limited tools means that the user can only do things in a certain limited way which may or may not derive good pictures depending on how limited the subject and tools are, as well as how optimised the user can make use of the limits. for more specific requirements of a certain field or vision, the user plays less role, except for making the subject and tools available to him.
2. practically: non-specification between these one-liners is just as good as those who ask about upgrades without saying why. not considering what technical aspect indicates an upgrade is similar in a way to not specifying what user factor, when improved, would avoid wasting that money. put it simply, knowing or saying that statement alone is not enough - a user not only need to know he can do it, he also need to know how he can do it.
wanting the highest and the most expensive model without stating any limitations is rarely the case, or at least hardly as common as those who consider between entry/sub-entry models versus intermediate/semi-professional models without knowing why, how and what will change.
if your question is what's "wrong" with the statement, then there is two way of looking at it,
1. academically: the statement is true as a "most often" situation, but not as an absolute or almost always. also, subject and tools are not as minor as what the statement seem to suggest, despite of user being of a significant factor. limited subject and limited tools means that the user can only do things in a certain limited way which may or may not derive good pictures depending on how limited the subject and tools are, as well as how optimised the user can make use of the limits. for more specific requirements of a certain field or vision, the user plays less role, except for making the subject and tools available to him.
2. practically: non-specification between these one-liners is just as good as those who ask about upgrades without saying why. not considering what technical aspect indicates an upgrade is similar in a way to not specifying what user factor, when improved, would avoid wasting that money. put it simply, knowing or saying that statement alone is not enough - a user not only need to know he can do it, he also need to know how he can do it.
Than if you buy the same set up as his, so you can take same kind of photos.. am I correct to say that?
wwwooooo... that is a little painful mate...
I think he meant with the same set up, there is possibility that he can get the same images and with practise and time, maybe that is a great possibility. At the end of the day, photography is a craft that makes the shooter improve over time...
I would say, with the correct knowledge and technique, yes. Btw don't have to put up a reply to racoon31e sarcastically and i don't think he mean it that way.
than he should said no one can produce that kind of photos with a Nikon D40.
I think Nikon would agreed with this, of course.
Its just like football "experts" saying "The Ball Is Round..." when they have no freaking idea what is going on......
that's what I understand from what he wrote, when I read from left to right, and from right to left...
Maybe its late and affecting your mind, Please look/read/understand what he wrote from left to right, and from right to left again. When did he ever mention anything about NO ONE can take that kind of pic?
And I think Nikon would not use freezing actions shots as a selling point for D40, of course.
what the propose of starting this thread/poll??
thinking of equipment can solve all the issues, OK, than stand up for what you believe, say it out loud.
I'm asking racoon31e does he think that with better equipment he can produce superb picture? if yes, why not, that's his believing, which line that I wrote ever "hoot" him??
you are the one say I wrote sarcastically! and I'm not happy.
The purpose is not to condemn this statement, and please read again from top to bottom again and again to see each and every post (not just mine). No one and i repeat NO ONE had ever said that equipment solves everything. Get it?
Sarcastic or not, well....
whats bothering you??
cheer up
the equipment does play a large role in my photography
how are you suppose to take birds with a 10-22mm??
Haa, i supposed maybe bring along a 10 metre high ladder?
Anyway, from all the replies posted, I believe anyone (except for some you-know-who)who is reading should have a clearer picture of what this thread is about.
If the rest still thinks that this is about condeming the statement, so be it, go read all the posts up and down, left to right again and again.
I know, but maybe someone with superb skill who does not need any fancy nancy equipment can make it happen? Perhaps even with a pin-hole or lomo? :devil:
i do agree you cant cause the kit lens is just too short.
i did capture these kind of shots before, using m42 mount manual focus 300mm f4 on my eos-d60. though its only 50% hit rate.
when people say the statement, i doubt "They think they are like Ansel Adams who can make brillant pics even from a pns or cam hp."
also, i doubt they mean you can achieve a 300mm lens close up using a 18-55mm kit lens. but rather, given a good old m42 mount manual focus 300mm lens, with practice, you can take sport photo as you would with a 300mm auto-focus lens (now dslr, cheaper lar, not like doing film days) though the hit rate may be lower.
also, can anyone advice me what kind of eqpt are needed if i want to freeze the moment when a dart burst a balloon filled with water? modern day high tech camera and flash? i garentee u, answer is no.
- Status
Similar threads
