Haa... Ya esp when people just came out of nowhere and put up that statement.
Yap, this thread is one-sided, but my point is, whats wrong with discussing equipment? So far I don't think anone had said they really need eg hi-end cam, lenses ect to take a particular pic.
It's a fact that certain cam with certain features HELPS (Canon's action beast-1dm3, Nikon's super dark iso 25600, Olympus E3 mulit-angled LCD live-view) in taking certain pics better and EASIER.
This doesn't applies just to photography but also cars, food, entertainment blah blah blah... You're a good driver, but you'll need a super fast car to win a race, You are a good cook, you'll need good ingredients to make superb cuisine, you love great movies, you'll need good quality hi res LCD/plasma + stereo system to fully utilise the potential of your stuff.
Back to photography, some people enjoy taking pics, some people enjoy discussing their toys while there are also people who enjoy both.
Broken record keeps repeating every now and then.:sticktong
Cause the newest and the greatest equipment will always tempt us.
It's like that Ferrari Enzo that overtook you when you are driving a Toyota Vios.
You wished you had it, you wished you tried it, but you know you won't get one cause it's not feasible.
Yap, thats the whole point! We all know that if we do not have the basic skill + upgrading process, be it in any field, we won't go far at all.
Discussing (knowing very well about own cam's function) and chasing newer technolgies (better features, faster focusing speed, less noise CMOS... ) does helps to improve better and maybe easier.
Its not the equipment but the man behind the cam and the girl in front of it.
Well because that statement is true.
You can have a Mk II, an L lens but your composition is off or your shot is blur / overexposed then it makes no different.
Which is a better photo?
1) A well composed and relatively sharp photos with average color (citic will say pic not shrap -- tinge of handsake... colors dull... but give it to her anyway, as her composition is good)
or
2) A poorly composed photo with super sharp and nice color. (citic will say ... look at that shrapness... and such rich colors...!!! -- ignoreing any mention of the poor composition -- esp. so if pic known to be taken by pro &/or pro eqipment
no lor, jay chou's toyota pwn big big ok :bsmilie:
it's not the car, but the man behind the wheel :bsmilie::bsmilie::bsmilie:
i know there are better photographers ot there only using 300D that can take better shots than me using my 40D.
i think, saying "Its not the equipment but the man behind the cam" is only self bitterness. they just cant afford more expensive gadgets and abit expensive gadgets makes me shooting happy.