I'm aiming the Canon 70-200 f4L. Now the question is if it's worth it to spend $700+- more to get the copy with IS.
Weight and portability is important so the 70-200 f2.8 is out.
I'll be shooting candids with it mostly. Occasionally, basketball games(sometimes at indoor court). I know the f2.8 would be more ideal for sports but shooting sports is not the main reason for the purchase. I'm wondering does the IS help with 4 stops compensation in this case? Or the f4 is simply incompetent for indoor sports, regardless if it has IS or not?
Your vote and advice are greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Weight and portability is important so the 70-200 f2.8 is out.
I'll be shooting candids with it mostly. Occasionally, basketball games(sometimes at indoor court). I know the f2.8 would be more ideal for sports but shooting sports is not the main reason for the purchase. I'm wondering does the IS help with 4 stops compensation in this case? Or the f4 is simply incompetent for indoor sports, regardless if it has IS or not?
Your vote and advice are greatly appreciated! Thanks!