SteadyHands said:
Come to think of it. Soccer is the dirtiest game played by prima donnas. Try watching rugby, the tackles are infinitely more times harder, challenges meaner but still players pick themselves up and continue with the game. And nobody argues with the ref, no matter how F***** up they think the ref is. Sigh...the nature of the game.
Oh, most definitely! After watching nearly the whole of Rugby World Cup in 2003, it took me a long while to get used to watching football (aka soccer) again 'cos the players went down so easily, whined like kids and at the 80th minute, I'd think the game is over.
Well, there are exceptions. I have seen arguments with the refs. And when a rugby game boils over, the players - especially the forwards who are bigger and stronger than the average footballer - can do serious damage to each other.
The culture (if I may call it that) of simulation is terrible. To add to what you said, when a rugby player gets tackled, he tries as much as possible NOT to go to ground. Contrast this with football where an even an
attempted tackle is the opportunity to go to ground. This is partly because the two games are quite different in terms of aims and strategies. Still, refs in football should be more vigilant.
It would help if there is a video referee for goal decisions and for fouls. They already institute disciplinary measures after the fact using video evidence. I don't see why it shouldn't help when it matters most - when the action is immediate.
I'm a United fan, and I feel ashamed by this morning's draw 'cos the goal was obvious to everyone watching it on TV. Spurs should have had three points. Reporters, commentators and fans who criticize the ref and linesman forget one thing - they are at a high vantage point where they can clearly see the goal line.
The ref and linesman were far away enough from United's goal to have not spotted the ball going over even though it was blatantly obvious to everyone watching that it went in.