I refer to these two pages on Straits Times Stomp:
http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/viewPost1794.aspx
http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/viewPost1902.aspx
I hope LTA can come out and make a public stand on this.
I find it totally inexcusable that a law enforcer would be permitted such leeway. Giving the same excuse that as normal offenders when they are caught, yet they are just reprimanded. I think the law enforcer in this case is not suitable for duty and should be discharged. In fact, for the parent company to defend such irresponsible actions, United Premas should be taken to the task.
The warden was parking not in an "undesignated parking area", but an "illegal parking area" aka "NO PARKING ZONE".
This was brought to many of our eyes only because someone caught it down on hard evidence. It makes me wonder how many others escaped our attention because others didn't get it down?
http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/viewPost1794.aspx
http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/viewPost1902.aspx
I hope LTA can come out and make a public stand on this.
I find it totally inexcusable that a law enforcer would be permitted such leeway. Giving the same excuse that as normal offenders when they are caught, yet they are just reprimanded. I think the law enforcer in this case is not suitable for duty and should be discharged. In fact, for the parent company to defend such irresponsible actions, United Premas should be taken to the task.
The warden was parking not in an "undesignated parking area", but an "illegal parking area" aka "NO PARKING ZONE".
This was brought to many of our eyes only because someone caught it down on hard evidence. It makes me wonder how many others escaped our attention because others didn't get it down?