Oriental Beauty (NC-16)
- Thread starter digitalbuff
- Start date
- Status
lemontree said:wow looks a little like Zhang Zi Yi man!She looks sad..
Yes, she has a very very sad look (like being forced to me a model). I was pissed at first but after reviewing the first few shots, i thought the "detached" look gave the series of pictures an interesting feel as well.
You know the usu. advice is to connect to the model, build rapport etc but this one was like totally opp. minimal communications and eye contact.
Who in the world will want to have a happy look or can give a smiling look when kanna photographed yr naked body by a dozen photographers, not even for art's sake? :cry:digitalbuff said:
I am sure the money means a lot to her (probably for education, family, foods, etc...). Give her a tip for her excellent job. Anyway the kimono ones are more artisitc. :thumbsup:
Those with the private hairs shown so clearly are no no :nono: , think you should ps them out.
Canonised said:
No la it's just this model. There are lots of models here that are very comfortable with being naked in front of the camera(s).
Actually i dun see anything wrong with pubic hair in artistic photography. It's part of our body and nothing to be ashame about but this is just my view.
digitalbuff said:
thank god i save your pic, the one with the side profile exposing the chest to the right and her face covered by her hair that one. i put it as my wallpaper but as it became blur after stretching, it put as a centred wallpaper.
anyway, nice model, nice photography.
Canonised said:
Wanna look at www.bodyscapes.com ? (Nudity Inside, do not enter if you find nude photography offensive or you are underage)
i personally think showing hair is ok... if not, all frontal nude models must shave meh??:dunno: but maybe in this case its body form is all smooth untill that part.. so might have been a spoiler.. imho..
Canonised said:
Hor!??? Is that your style??? I have shoot alot's of them, but not really like what you said lay. You must know some are really go for art's! And some are because of they want to keep their pic when they are still got a good body shape before they get old:bsmilie: Correct???
Some are working for money but cum art's!
OMG ... another one straight from Victorian England ...Canonised said:
Censor this censor that censor everything until there is only a white canvas!
I will call an early wrap to a shoot if the model is that unhappy. If I can't, I will walk. Of all these years of shooting, I only did it once, and the reason was definately not because she was nude and there were a dozen of photographer shooting her.
Money, we all work for money. Anything wrong? My motivation to go to work has nothing to do with education, family or something nobel like that. For all you care, the model ay just be doing this because she enjoys the experience.
Brudder Bob, thanks for the link which unfortunately I found to be totally unrelated to the photos taken by buff .... unless of course buff PS a golfball or some gardening equipments onto that hairy patch. Least I am mistaken and hound by the Pack (which is getting very std here), what i insisted was that private hairs/parts should be "artistically covered" if they are to be included in photos to be posted in the internet.Bobman said:
I want to assure you that i am not underage and probably i have seen a nude body way before you were born (but hope that i am wrong ... :bsmilie: )
For private viewing or shooting, of course shooting those parts can be a hairy erotic experience for all parties involved, and I am not really against it from an artistic point of view.
Frankly it's rather shallow to term someone who you dont know at all "another one straight from Victorian England" who happened to have a RESPONSIBLE attitude toward nudity. I am for free speech, free thinking, free ideas, individualism, but we must be responsible to the society at large. A lot of things are NOT meant for the public at large. It is very easy to make comments and suggestions but the ppl involved will have to answer to the rest of the members.
Regardless of what you think of me, I am still for self-censorship and responsible comments. :think: .... and DP please stop giving names to people you don't even know :nono: and who happened to have some perspectives different from you.
Buff, these pictures are one of the best i have seen. I really enjoyed it the artistic style on how the model poses as well as how you frame it (especially with the long dress stretched to the right end). Not to mention the sharpness and details as well as the way all the pictures are linked together not by dress, pose but by the model's expression.
So i just wanna let you know, amongst all these people who keeps arguing about CS allowing nude and all that bull about how melancholy this is, here is one person that admires your pictures for what they are.
Awesome man. 3 thumbs up for you :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
So i just wanna let you know, amongst all these people who keeps arguing about CS allowing nude and all that bull about how melancholy this is, here is one person that admires your pictures for what they are.
Awesome man. 3 thumbs up for you :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
jfoo said:
Art should be availble to everyone of all ages. As a matter of fact, the younger the child is, generally the more innocent to the pure form of the human body the child will be.
It is the responsibility of parents and guardians of children to educate them on the use of the internet. Pornographic sites are everywhere and I don't see how a couple of artistically shot photographs showing a nude person is more offensive then (or even can be compared to) pornography.
Yes the admins and moderators are doing a great job but please don't get too over-zealous and correlate pornography and artistic nudity.
Notice that such artistic nudes are done the following way:
1 B&W
2 Unidirectional light
3 High contrast
I am sure being artistic, there could be other variants.
1 B&W
2 Unidirectional light
3 High contrast
I am sure being artistic, there could be other variants.
personally i like pictures 2482,2485 and 2476 from the oriental series, my only comment is that for those three pictures you could try styling the kimono abit, because it seemed too horizontal and kinda stop the eyes midway thru the sensual contours.
second the lighting isn't very balanced.
the bridge between higlight mid and shadow are too drastic, maybe you could control the light better or have a bounce to soften it up
you are using a softbox am i correct?
maybe you could put the box closer to her and turn down the power a little,because the lighting seemed "by the way" like its hitting her but she's not the subject.
sometimes the light/shadow seemed too distinct and sometimes too murky.
cropping wise, im not very impressed but thats my personal taste, think nothing of it,
but loosen up, and play with your cropping just play.. have fun
peace:thumbsup:
second the lighting isn't very balanced.
the bridge between higlight mid and shadow are too drastic, maybe you could control the light better or have a bounce to soften it up
you are using a softbox am i correct?
maybe you could put the box closer to her and turn down the power a little,because the lighting seemed "by the way" like its hitting her but she's not the subject.
sometimes the light/shadow seemed too distinct and sometimes too murky.
cropping wise, im not very impressed but thats my personal taste, think nothing of it,
but loosen up, and play with your cropping just play.. have fun
peace:thumbsup:
- Status
Similar threads
