Hi Any of you got this FX lens ? Can anyone advice how good is this lens on FX body ?
Thanks In Adv
daredevil123 said:I think the 35/1.8 is sharper than the 35/2
mscommerce said:This is one of the best Nikon lenses I have used. Definitely a pro grade lens for color, contrast and sharpness.:thumbsup::thumbsup:
Hi. How is the DOF for this lens ? Heard that the Bokeh is very nice
The AF-S 35mm f1.8 cost $2150. To ex for me so Thot that to get the 35mm f2D issit good cos is only about $530 for this lens. See any brother or sister have got this lens can give a short review of this lens. Thanks
tat's the 35 f/1.4 which costs 2150, not the f/1.8. 35mm f/1.8 is meant for DX only, but still can be used on FX using FX mode, n costs around 320+.
review of 35 f/1.4
[vid]f2C9EXiLnqQ[/vid]
Bro TS asked about FX performance la.
diediealsomustdive said:I have, vignettes noticeably. May be ok for those who love to vignette their shots, not me.
nightwolf75 said:http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=816636
IMO, 35/2 is currently the best value-for-$ vis-a-vis 35/1.4. unless you are out for absolute performance and sharpness, the AFD35/2 is a good buy for FX.
lol this fake ang mo slang gia again.
he never fail to amuse me.
I believe once you have tried the 35mm f1.4G, you will never look back to the 35mm f2D.
The object isolation effect, resolution, colour and contrasty level of the 35mm f1.4G at wide open f1.4 are amazing. The only thing that the 35mm f2D can beat is the price.
It's not fake. And it's british accent. He studies in england for quite a long time before he started hosting DigitalRev TV videos. People do change their accent if they stay in a foreign country for a long time.