Hi guys
Just want to clarify probably a very basic question that i should be aware of :embrass:
I shot this picture of my wife on a Fuji Neopan 1600 film 2 weeks back
I shot it at asa 1600, but it looks very contrasty... some of the details look gone.. ( at least from my monitor. I havent done any editing yet
For details, we should always shoot under? ( i.e i should have shot at asa 800 to keep more details? ) I think I read it somewhere here before on this.
This is another picture of my wife that I shot using a Agfa 400 much earlier. the colour looks brighter and clearer.
at indoors it seems asa 400 is more than enough. Will the type of the film also play part in some form or other?
Just want to clarify probably a very basic question that i should be aware of :embrass:
I shot this picture of my wife on a Fuji Neopan 1600 film 2 weeks back
I shot it at asa 1600, but it looks very contrasty... some of the details look gone.. ( at least from my monitor. I havent done any editing yet
For details, we should always shoot under? ( i.e i should have shot at asa 800 to keep more details? ) I think I read it somewhere here before on this.
This is another picture of my wife that I shot using a Agfa 400 much earlier. the colour looks brighter and clearer.
at indoors it seems asa 400 is more than enough. Will the type of the film also play part in some form or other?