MyMacro


Status
Not open for further replies.

crystal1993

New Member
Aug 16, 2010
1,049
0
0
30
Japan, Tokyo
Hi, first time trying out macro photography. Pardon my noob pictures and not close up enough as i'm using my 18-55 kit lens for this. :sweat:


1.
167272_1781685786011_1355451962_31993373_3552983_n.jpg


2.
164369_1781687906064_1355451962_31993382_5577365_n.jpg


3.
162923_1781690426127_1355451962_31993389_5916721_n.jpg


4.
36246_1781694386226_1355451962_31993407_983167_n.jpg
 

not marco ...... my 2cts
 

Too big to be considered macro-- My opinion
 

Be aggressive and go closer. If it's flower focus on a single bloom, if it's insect (it's not easy, I understand), fill it's whole body covering at least 50% of the frame. Best is to get its eyes focus.
 

with kit lens, challenge would be min focusing distance and max magnification. a budget solution would be raynox. definitely cheaper than a canon 100mm usm macro ;)

my suggestion: for a start, look for less challenging subjects. bees and butterflies are :sweat: they almost never stop moving.

look for nice flowers, and slower insects that won't hop / fly away in a hurry when you go close. they will allow you to practice your close-up technique.

trying to chase a fast moving insect around through your VF is a recipe for motion sickness... first few times i tried, i nearly :ipuke:
 

not marco ...... my 2cts

Too big to be considered macro-- My opinion

Oops. My bad. :cry:

Be aggressive and go closer. If it's flower focus on a single bloom, if it's insect (it's not easy, I understand), fill it's whole body covering at least 50% of the frame. Best is to get its eyes focus.

with kit lens, challenge would be min focusing distance and max magnification. a budget solution would be raynox. definitely cheaper than a canon 100mm usm macro ;)

my suggestion: for a start, look for less challenging subjects. bees and butterflies are :sweat: they almost never stop moving.

look for nice flowers, and slower insects that won't hop / fly away in a hurry when you go close. they will allow you to practice your close-up technique.

trying to chase a fast moving insect around through your VF is a recipe for motion sickness... first few times i tried, i nearly :ipuke:

Thanks a lot for the tips!
 

keep shooting n keep a lookout of whats the pro here are posting n u will definely made it in time to come:);)
 

I guess u have tried your best to shot like macro. :)

Maybe you consider to use dedicated macro lens for macro. ;)
 

Don't despair. CS Detritus had made good propositions for you to explore and using 18-55 with Raynox 250 would mean you need to use the farther reach, at 55mm. You also have other options including loaning/borrowing a Macro lens or buying a telephoto + Raynox or getting a 2nd hand lens... :)
 

nice try . . . keep it up . . . :)
 

Yes, get the Raynox DCR-250.

That's how I get started with, from 18-55mm or 50mm lens, to 2nd hand 55-200mm lens, and still attach it to a 105mm macro lens for more magnification. It's very useful, so if you have interest, go with this inexpensive purchase first.
 

keep shooting n keep a lookout of whats the pro here are posting n u will definely made it in time to come:)

Thanks!

I guess u have tried your best to shot like macro. :)

Maybe you consider to use dedicated macro lens for macro. ;)

Yeah i'm currently working and saving up money to get the ef-s 60mm macro lens! =D

Don't despair. CS Detritus had made good propositions for you to explore and using 18-55 with Raynox 250 would mean you need to use the farther reach, at 55mm. You also have other options including loaning/borrowing a Macro lens or buying a telephoto + Raynox or getting a 2nd hand lens... :)

Yeah will go check out the raynox! Btw won't it affect IQ? I heard from some of my friends that raynox will affect IQ. @_@

nice try . . . keep it up . . . :)

Thanks!

Yes, get the Raynox DCR-250.

That's how I get started with, from 18-55mm or 50mm lens, to 2nd hand 55-200mm lens, and still attach it to a 105mm macro lens for more magnification. It's very useful, so if you have interest, go with this inexpensive purchase first.

How much is it aga aga? =D
 

Yeah will go check out the raynox! Btw won't it affect IQ? I heard from some of my friends that raynox will affect IQ. @_@

slightly lah... unless u're a compulsive pixel peeper, the pix are very usable and its a reasonable compromise - good magnification for slight loss in IQ.

for beginners, its a very affordable way to get started in macro. the raynox 250 is $125 last i checked.
 

Don't despair. CS Detritus had made good propositions for you to explore and using 18-55 with Raynox 250 would mean you need to use the farther reach, at 55mm. You also have other options including loaning/borrowing a Macro lens or buying a telephoto + Raynox or getting a 2nd hand lens... :)

slightly lah... unless u're a compulsive pixel peeper, the pix are very usable and its a reasonable compromise - good magnification for slight loss in IQ.

for beginners, its a very affordable way to get started in macro. the raynox 250 is $125 last i checked.

Honestly, for me... I wouldn't be too concerned over the image quality especially if the essence of the picture is compromised. The latter will totally 'spoil' the shot. Yes, it's $125 but there used to be other CS members selling used Raynox for lower. You might want to put up a WTB. Personally, I would prefer a dedicated 1:1 macro. The choice is really yours.;)
 

slightly lah... unless u're a compulsive pixel peeper, the pix are very usable and its a reasonable compromise - good magnification for slight loss in IQ.

for beginners, its a very affordable way to get started in macro. the raynox 250 is $125 last i checked.

Ooh ok. Btw noob question. If i use raynox 250 i can just use my cam as per normal right? Can use af all those etc? Or is there somethings i have to take note of??

Honestly, for me... I wouldn't be too concerned over the image quality especially if the essence of the picture is compromised. The latter will totally 'spoil' the shot. Yes, it's $125 but there used to be other CS members selling used Raynox for lower. You might want to put up a WTB. Personally, I would prefer a dedicated 1:1 macro. The choice is really yours.;)

But now i'm on budget constraint so i might try out the raynox and when i saved up enough than i shall go for 100L macro. :devil:
 

Ooh ok. Btw noob question. If i use raynox 250 i can just use my cam as per normal right? Can use af all those etc? Or is there somethings i have to take note of??

But now i'm on budget constraint so i might try out the raynox and when i saved up enough than i shall go for 100L macro. :devil:

haha... yes AF will work but whether it will lock on the correct thing or not, i don't know. ;p

i MF when i do macro... my favourite macro lens is an old-school MF lens that turns almost 2 full rounds to focus from infinity to min-focusing distance :lovegrin: love it to bits.
 

haha... yes AF will work but whether it will lock on the correct thing or not, i don't know. ;p

i MF when i do macro... my favourite macro lens is an old-school MF lens that turns almost 2 full rounds to focus from infinity to min-focusing distance :lovegrin: love it to bits.

My AF is i only use the center AF point. Meaning i off the auto af selection points and set it to AF only at the center so it's still ok right?

Because i read some where that the raynox will throw their AF into confusion while some other reviews will state that AF is ok so i'm quite confuse. @_@


A lot of people MF when they do macro is it because it's better?
I'm quite bad at MF but i do practice from time to time. Trying to get the hang of it as i need to wear glasses but quite lazy to wear them so i see most things as a blur and have to strain or go close in order to see it clearly. :sweat:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.