Whatever famous international news agency you worked for, it is inappropriate to be "INSIDE" a tense situation and assuming that there would be no foul play by either sides. From the video, one can feel that he was actually in the middle of all the actions, which was really very dangerous, and expecting both parties would let you video all the actions for the world to see just because one is from an international news agency.
Even if one does not expect real violence, one can never underestimate the motive of the "invisible third hand" in action.
It is now obvious that a third group would like to see real bloodshed here. The question is: was he intentionally shot at or was it accidental? :think:
