Is it okay for models to photoshop their given photos by the photographers who shot them, before adding it into their portfolio?
watermark not edited away.
watermark not edited away.
for me, it is fine if they want to re-crop, touch up, or do whatever they like, as long not reselling the images, unless they already pay for it.
I don't really bother to add watermark, if the model like my work, they know who should get the credits, if they don't like the photos, your watermark big big also no use.
btw, if the PS is badly done by the model, please don't ever mention my name if I have shot this for the model.
LOL. because sometimes it's kinda sad that the model can't put a particular pose into her portfolio because of some flaws on the skin, although she likes the pose alot.
LOL. because sometimes it's kinda sad that the model can't put a particular pose into her portfolio because of some flaws on the skin, although she likes the pose alot.
were all the pics not touched up? or the photog did touching up and the pic couldnt be saved? if its was the latter, then why do you still wanna try? it may look even worse right?
In conclusion,
I think maybe if the model wants, she should seek the photographer with the photoshopped image.
Right?
hmm. if the model knows how to do it? I've known some photographers who do not know how to use photoshop at all.
for me, I give all original image to model, so it is fine with me they want to do PS themself.hmm. if the model knows how to do it? I've known some photographers who do not know how to use photoshop at all.