Hi all.....
I did not get sucked into the high megapixels race that DSLR manufacturers are in, mainly due to my area of photography... but am wondering about the need for high clean ISO for digital SLR....
my question specifically is.. now we can shoot up to ISO6400 with almost clean images but do we need high and clean ISO capability especially for low-light situations where flash/tripod is not allowed or not feasible?
i mean...back in the film era, the highest one can go is ISO 400 right? (If i am not wrong about it) so what do photographers do when faced with low-light situations like concert photography where flash/tripod is not allowed or feasible?:bigeyes:
Pls share your experience and thoughts on this matter....
am asking this as i foresee being sucked in the high and clean ISO race... and yah, i know it is the photographer behind the gear that matters...:bsmilie:
I did not get sucked into the high megapixels race that DSLR manufacturers are in, mainly due to my area of photography... but am wondering about the need for high clean ISO for digital SLR....
my question specifically is.. now we can shoot up to ISO6400 with almost clean images but do we need high and clean ISO capability especially for low-light situations where flash/tripod is not allowed or not feasible?
i mean...back in the film era, the highest one can go is ISO 400 right? (If i am not wrong about it) so what do photographers do when faced with low-light situations like concert photography where flash/tripod is not allowed or feasible?:bigeyes:
Pls share your experience and thoughts on this matter....
am asking this as i foresee being sucked in the high and clean ISO race... and yah, i know it is the photographer behind the gear that matters...:bsmilie: