I have always been wondering... what are the difference in using an actual filter and using post-production to recreate the effects of the filters?
I have always been wondering... what are the difference in using an actual filter and using post-production to recreate the effects of the filters?
If you can post-produce a filter to blur a waterfall like a ND can do to make your exposure time longer, then I salute you.
can post process a GND for sky.... but not the water fall blurry....
also... CPL cannot be done in PP.... ima right?
I heard there is a blur filter call motion blur in photoshop, should be able to create such effect right?If you can post-produce a filter to blur a waterfall like a ND can do to make your exposure time longer, then I salute you.
think can add a lot of layer mask, mask here mask there, don't need to burn here burn there to get the results....Pretty much. There is also a limit to producing a GND in post for the sky. You will not get the same kind of dynamic range by burning in the sky in post as actually putting a filter over the sky portion at the point of shooting.
think can add a lot of layer mask, mask here mask there, don't need to burn here burn there to get the results....
:bsmilie:
I have always been wondering... what are the difference in using an actual filter and using post-production to recreate the effects of the filters?