artdirector said:
The website was down. I tried to answer your mail earlier but was logged out. I have only just got back in
I am afraid that your reason for not answering my questions earlier holds no water. You had blamed it on the failed website.
The facts are:
I posted my question on 11 May 2006 in post #3.
On the morning of 12 May, you gave replies to posts #2, 4 and 5. When I saw that you did not gave a reply to my questions in post #3, I asked you to clarify my questions again in post #10.
You returned in the evening of 12 May, and gave replies to posts #9, 11, 12 and 13. Again bypassing my question in post #10.
Was the website suffering failure intermittently only when you tried to reply to my posts in #3 and #10, but working perfectly well when you replied to posts #2, 4, 5, 9, 11, and 12?
I can give some possible reasons to your failure to answer my questions
1 You did not want to reply to my queries (which is impossible, since you did say that you tried to reply to me, with the unfortunate non-cooperation of the website). Actually you have every right to ignore my questions. but you did want to reply, didn't you?
2 You suffer from some form of visual aberration somehow leading to you not seeing my question. But this is also very unlikely, because if you did not see my questions, you will not say that you tried to answer.
3 You have special reasons why you may be reluctant to answer my questions. This is OK. We all have reasons not to disclose everything.
artdirector said:
But tell me what on earth is the point in wasting people's time by being a 'bogus operator'?
I have absolutely no idea. But what am I to think given the scenario you created with regards to the way you handled my questions?
artdirector said:
The event is Miss European Tourism International. We are putting together a group of organisors covering all aspects of the compeition in an effort to send the best from Singapore.
Thank you!
Now isn't that simple?
But now let us come back to what this is all about.
From what I could see, you are not here primarily to give us the "opportunity" to photograph wonderful models. We all know that there are many wannabes models, and that many in the preliminary rounds are really not quite up to it. I do not know your standards for this competition. But look at Miss Universe and the aspirants. In my opinion, only the finalists in the Miss Singapore/Universe are worth photographing, and that opinion may be challenged by many. How will your early contestants fare against the Miss Singapore wannabes?
No, I think the main reason is that you are trying to raise funds. Keep it clear, and do not try to say you are doing us a great favor by giving us opportunities to photograph wonderful models. In all possibility, these early rounds will comprise many, well, "average" aspirants. Of course, with luck, there can also be some really good ones.
My suggestion to you is this. Get your models/competitors. When you are ready, show their images on the workshop subforum. Then let members decide if they want to photograph these models. Organise it like any other photoshoot.