Hi guys, first of all, before commenting on my below reply, I have a simple request - read what I have to say carefully. I read through all your posts before commenting each time... the least you could do is to return the respect, and this would benefit both you and me.
Cater, I can't be bothered with you and your dribel... and your name-calling. Sigh, you seem pretty worked up. You really should stop sleeping with your Olympus under your pillow, even though you clearly love it so much.
It's not healthy, y'know.
Initially I had this nagging feeling that you were one of the R&D engineers of Olympus' in-body system, since you were clearly advocating it. Plus you kept"advising" me with a couple of ancient Chinese idioms... I couldn't help but link this up with the fact that Olympus cameras are manufactured in China. Ahh... you have to forgive me for being so presumptuous.
Of course now I have my doubts about you coming from Olympus development... since you have clearly displayed lack of knowledge and courteous reason in your posts. I guess it's forgivable, this being the newbie's corner.
-
I never advocated any camera brand or IS system. I only talked about the differences in IS systems and attempted to debunk, with anecdotes about why Canon and Nikon goes with lens-based IS systems instead of going with the in-body approach that appears to make more economic sense.
I also quoted this Japanese saying, "different strokes for different folks". In essence, what works for one person may not work for another. It's a self-discovery kind of thing.
Hence, I suggested that newbies go to the DSLR shops to try the different cameras and their IS systems in order to get a feel of the different methods implemented by the makers. Quote as below.
"A hands-on feel to both types of IS implementations would be a great (and free) addition of knowledge. You may even discover which type of system works for you, which ultimately will be the answer to your questions, right? Yay."
On an ending note, I think Mark summed it up very nicely in his reasoning "why 450D trumps the E-520". This will be the important question for most newbies: why this camera over another?
My advice is... go feel the camera for yourself at the stores, read a good mix of anecdotal reviews (such as kenrockwell.com), detailed brochure-like reviews (dpreview), and link up with your friends who own DSLRs. Or their friends who own DSLRs. Talk to them, and don't be afraid to ask questions.
Remember, it's no small investment. You aren't buying a camera body as per Point-And-Shoot cameras.
You're buying into a system - lenses, flashes, mount adapter compatibility (perhaps your dad owned a couple of old K mount pentax lenses?), Image-Stablization systems, after-sales support, third-party lens compatibility, battery grips, etc.
Because a large majority of newbies will not be satisfied with just owning a DSLR kit. After a while, you will start questioning what your DSLR can do. And explore avenues to maximize its potential (adding accessories and buying lenses/flashes, etc) so you can get better pictures.
So treat your DSLR purchase seriously. No point involving yourself in all the brand war nonsense that some people here at Clubsnap are so eager to launch themselves into. Photography is a practical hobby, no point sitting in front of the computer launching into hypothetical discussions... these will never end because some people just love their gear too much.
Most importantly, you're happy with your purchase, because you know you did enough homework... and thus you are enjoying your experience with photography.
I know I'm really happy with my cameras. They bring me and other people a lot of joy, and that was something I learnt by focusing on my shooting, instead of sitting in front of my computer replying certain stupid people.