IS in many situations is like masturbation... just for self satisfaction.
it can be useful but definitely not a big deal as many make it out to be, not at such short focal lengths.
Haha! Good one, bro!
IS in many situations is like masturbation... just for self satisfaction.
it can be useful but definitely not a big deal as many make it out to be, not at such short focal lengths.
you can try this technique. results may vary.Another guy say shooting 1/4s with or wthout IS is suicidal. I guarantee you that many masters in the photography community can shoot still subjects at 1/4s and not get suicidal results.
Handholding at a 24-70L, with or without IS, shooting at 1/4s at an event is suicidal.
And for all of you who think that IS is not useful/necessary at short focal lengths, remember that people use DSLRs for videos too. So like PrimePhotog said, "The world of photography does not revolve around you".
I think we really read to much reviews.
I never see any soft image out of 24-70L (there can also be bad copies of prime, someone recently bought 35L and it was lemon).
I can guess prime will be sharper as there are not many focal length there to play with in same lens, but given different situation i think ppl prefer different lens. I like 35L but then i like to take my kids together and some time zoomed on face area. Using 35L i don't think i can achieve it with one lens unless i run near or far to compensate zoom .
I sold my 24-70L to try prime but end-up i am still stuck so for time being i am using 50f1.8 and loving the IQ.
And for all of you who think that IS is not useful/necessary at short focal lengths, remember that people use DSLRs for videos too. So like PrimePhotog said, "The world of photography does not revolve around you".
I love 50 but even on FF it is a bit tight for home :sweat:, i think 35 is the best (35L can be a plus but need more money ).
Haha my gf consistently complain about my love for 50mm f1.8. Especially when we are indoor. It gets a bit challenging but i cant yet afford another prime of a lesser focal length.
Do you think these masters can do it without IS? Hmm... Why do i have a feeling that they can do it without IS?
I read that you bought your flash and budget on it.... so just slowly save money for the 35mm F2.... it is really sharp and contrasty little devil.... noisy like a bee buzzing around, but it is fast in AF and light.... build quality is not that well built but reasonable.....
How I wish Canon have a ring USM version for 24 F2.8, 35mm F2 & 50mm F1.4............ :dunno:
This is the reason now i rent before i commit for purchase. I was thinking to go straight and buy 35L but after renting i really miss my 24-70L (but only issue is it is bit heavy on 5D and some time my wife want to take picture then she cannot handle 5D+24-70 :sweat.Well... you cannot blame anyone for reading too much review before purchase... this is a lens that is gonna cost $1K+++ above... and no one like to buy a wrong lens.... if it is let's say.... tissue paper... who is going to read so much review about a pack of tissue????
I remembered someone saying about fake Canon products... so maybe it is possible there's fake L lens??? I still insist of pissing the sales guy when I buy lens... test here and there to ensure I am happy with it... even if I reject the lens, I do not feel embarrassment if I find it questionable......
Prime need a bit more footwork, and even then, you might still not be able to frame properly.... I find 50mm too tight at times... but some have said it is the right lens to shoot with due to it close to our eyes perspective... I take the 35mm (FOV) anytime...
Not planning on any lens to go with your 5D???? 50mm is sharp... but if you do not complain about the bokeh... it is still ok.... sharpness is there... color is not too bad....
Yes, that is definitely a lens i will consider coz i do quite alot of indoor shooting.
This is the reason now i rent before i commit for purchase. I was thinking to go straight and buy 35L but after renting i really miss my 24-70L (but only issue is it is bit heavy on 5D and some time my wife want to take picture then she cannot handle 5D+24-70 :sweat.
For now i want to wait and see till PHOTOKINA, but 50mm is really giving me some sharp result at 5D2.
This was short with a 50mmf1.7 wide open, 1/10s, ISO 160, handheld. Most should know there this bell relic is.
Who would bring a 24-70L to an event to shoot at 1/4s? Is this the main purpose of this lens if there were an IS version?
Well... hope you strike 4D or something and get your 35mm F2 soon.....
Haha saving up man. Eventually i am looking at getting 24-70mm when i start work next year.
Hi Bro...
Did you shoot this with 50mm F1.4 or F1.8 wide open???? 1/10???