Does this work for you
- Thread starter lastboltnut
- Start date
- Status
Its still a photo, an over-cooked photo.:bsmilie:
Kidding. Thanks for the feedbakc, I will re-work on it to see how it goes. Thanks.
Kidding. Thanks for the feedbakc, I will re-work on it to see how it goes. Thanks.
Hi, I am fine with constructive comments....it does look a bit wierd to me, thats why I put it up for critics to find out what went wrong....so its fine.Thanks.
Hi all,
I have re-tried the PP and here are the first and second version. Please give your comment again.
I will tell my preference later.Ü
Thanks.
#Version 1
#Version 2: Upon all the ideas and critics, I have re-done the PP, please comment again if it is better or not:
I have re-tried the PP and here are the first and second version. Please give your comment again.
I will tell my preference later.Ü
Thanks.
#Version 1
#Version 2: Upon all the ideas and critics, I have re-done the PP, please comment again if it is better or not:
I think the first PP-ed one was wonderful. Don't change it. The processing outcome has the same effect of Dave Hill's style albeit slightly different. you can take a look at his photos at www.davehillphoto.com
and this style works here because of the nice setting and the old looking car
Well done :thumbsup:
and this style works here because of the nice setting and the old looking car
Well done :thumbsup:
two takes from lastboltnut's raw file in photomatix- dude the file you sent me, i don't have nef plugin or what because i don't use photoshop raw or whatever it's called
so just put it through hdr, somehow the programme cannot recover any of your clouds in the sky
color
sepia
did you give me the correct raw file? maybe send me the jpg too, if possible, possibly the program cannot handle evening out exposure of shadows and highlights during underexposure, based on experience.. so perhaps that's why
so just put it through hdr, somehow the programme cannot recover any of your clouds in the sky
color
sepia
did you give me the correct raw file? maybe send me the jpg too, if possible, possibly the program cannot handle evening out exposure of shadows and highlights during underexposure, based on experience.. so perhaps that's why
ya dude tat photo was overcooked and overexposure ...i preefer u #2 photo, and consider tat the original photo also nice u can play level want to put shrpness at the photo so it would b colour full..IMHO...but make it BW quite well too
i still prefer the #2 BNW one....its good....So good that can be made into a commerical poster......:bsmilie:
Hi peepeedog, thank you for your compliment....I am far from Dave Hill lah....but to be frank, I am a "contrast" lover and I love his works......may be its the high contrast that many thought the pic was over sharpened.
Bro, I have a coloured version where I convert my 1st BW from. But I need to further remove the glow on the building like the 2nd BW to improve it. I put all 3 together for easy comparison:
#Version 1
#Version 2: Upon all the ideas and critics, I have re-done the PP, please comment again if it is better or not:
#Colour Version
Its the correct NEF (nikon raw) that I send you....I have only one NEF on this shot. I will send you the original colour version w/o PP later when I am home.
Thanks!
#Version 1
#Version 2: Upon all the ideas and critics, I have re-done the PP, please comment again if it is better or not:
#Colour Version
Its the correct NEF (nikon raw) that I send you....I have only one NEF on this shot. I will send you the original colour version w/o PP later when I am home.
Thanks!
two takes from lastboltnut's raw file in photomatix- dude the file you sent me, i don't have nef plugin or what because i don't use photoshop raw or whatever it's called
so just put it through hdr, somehow the programme cannot recover any of your clouds in the sky
color
sepia
did you give me the correct raw file? maybe send me the jpg too, if possible, possibly the program cannot handle evening out exposure of shadows and highlights during underexposure, based on experience.. so perhaps that's why
Hi martadinata171, thanks for the comments. You can have a look at the colour version I have in the previous post. Is it ok?
hrm, must be the program, have no control, can post up small version of original file here? =D in jpg
No possible to use Photomatix? Was hoping to see the difference between Photomatix 1 single raw "HDR" vs CS2 PP...
No possible to use Photomatix? Was hoping to see the difference between Photomatix 1 single raw "HDR" vs CS2 PP...
photomatix couldn't squeeze details out leh, i tried quite long already still get funny results =(
- Status
Similar threads
