you like the convenience of the 18-270?
I've not heard many rave reviews about the image quality or sharpness from this lens.
If you like convenience, then of course 18-55 + 75-300 is pretty redundant once you get the 18-270. I would sell them in this case.
But if it were my choice, i'd stick to the present combo.
what kind of photos do you like to take anyway?
how about Sigma 18-250 & Tamron 18-250?
is it good?
Yes, i like convenience for Tamron 18-270.
any other good suggestion for the image quality & sharpness?
i like to take portrait & landscape
Yes, i like convenience for Tamron 18-270.
any other good suggestion for the image quality & sharpness?
i like to take portrait & landscape
For portrait, I would suggest you get prime lens. 50mm f/1.8 II is a good one to start off with. You can probably keep your 18-55 for landscape and sell off your 75-300. Alternatively you might want to sell off both your lens and get a 17-55 f/2.8.
i just bought a Sony 18-250, now trying to sell off my 18-55 and 75-300 :dunno:
I second this.!sell off ur 75-300 and keep the 18-55mm, it is still gd for normal shooting...
I got the 18-250...it is light n gd for travelling...
of course, if i got the budget, i would definitely go for 18-270..:devil:
I agree that the IQ/sharpness of Tamron 18-270mm may lose to the IQ/sharpness of the Canon 18-55mm and 75-300mm lens.Hmm For this case... Some people think that Tamron cover the range of 18-270!
So why do I still need a 18-55 or a 75-300?
Hmm It is convenience and you don't have to keep changing lens...
Well the sharpness or the speed might not be that good as 75-300 or 18-55.