Critique Part II


Status
Not open for further replies.

yewsiang

New Member
Mar 20, 2006
9
0
0
#1
This is a continuation of my previous post. To make it less messy, I have decided to start another thread for this pair of corrected pics. Fire away, critics...which one is better? Done on a Spyder calibrated display with 2.2 gamma... Thanks to all in advance.

 

spurssy

New Member
May 27, 2004
457
0
0
#2
Well, care to say what you did to the photos? So that I have a better understanding and focal points...

Anyway, based on what I can differentiate, it's the colours and lines.. the top one is definitely better.

However, if the cars are your subjects, do something to the background (blur it). With cars, it's very easy to do a selection, inverse and blur the bgd.

Of course you don't blur the foreground (the road, etc.) to maintain realism.

EDIT: Oops, i didn't see the previous thread about this comparison... i tot your previous meant another set of photos... pls forgive if anything has been mentioned previously.
 

yewsiang

New Member
Mar 20, 2006
9
0
0
#3
Erm....no. Nothing like what you said has been said in my previous post. :)
 

theRBK

Senior Member
May 16, 2005
2,048
1
0
#4
the problem with the usual street lights is that they are not really incandescent but sodium vapour lights...they are very deficient in many colours...if the cars are blue or green the colours might look funny...but looking at the street sign (the blue wheelchair sign which is blue), there seems to be some other forms of lighting as well, or the street lights are not the usual sodium vapour types...
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom