can i ask something.. maybe i don't understand the concept of judging but...
one would expect the overall winner of the entire competition WOULD be one of the theme winners right?
I mean if "best of show" ain't belonging to one of the winners of the theme, doesn't that contradict the judges' decision?
I was wondering this when i participated in the past 2 marathons and am very amused when they announce the top 3 of each theme, then proceed to put top 20 (or is it top 10, cant rem) that are in the running for Grand prize when logically speaking, only the winner of each theme should win the grand prize. If the grand prize is based on voting, then yea that is correct. However if the grand prize is based on technicality etc etc etc, then shouldn't one of the theme winners win the grand prize too?
am i opening a can of worms?