BW film?


Status
Not open for further replies.

b18

New Member
Nov 8, 2002
783
0
0
39
Kangaroo land
www.estphoto.com
#1
Hi all,

Just wondering what sort of 35mm BW film you use to snap ppl, ie wedding?
My friend is having a wedding and I want to try out on becoming a backup photographer :)

thx.
 

coke21

New Member
May 12, 2003
706
0
0
42
East
Visit site
#2
b18 said:
Hi all,

Just wondering what sort of 35mm BW film you use to snap ppl, ie wedding?
My friend is having a wedding and I want to try out on becoming a backup photographer :)

thx.
You can try the Ilford films. Delta or HP series? Those films are not cheap not to mention the processing costs.

Either that you can try the chromogenic ones. For Ilford, XP2 or T400CN Kodak.
 

jon33

New Member
Aug 18, 2002
495
0
0
37
go north!
www.imagestation.com
#3
coke21 said:
You can try the Ilford films. Delta or HP series? Those films are not cheap not to mention the processing costs.

Either that you can try the chromogenic ones. For Ilford, XP2 or T400CN Kodak.
B&W not that expensive..its actually cheaper for me to shoot and process tmax400 than fuji superia 100. try searching the forum for people selling bulk rolled B&W film to try it out at lower cost.

:)
 

coke21

New Member
May 12, 2003
706
0
0
42
East
Visit site
#4
jon33 said:
B&W not that expensive..its actually cheaper for me to shoot and process tmax400 than fuji superia 100. try searching the forum for people selling bulk rolled B&W film to try it out at lower cost.

:)
True and not true. Depends on where you develop. For me developing superia with 37 prints is definitely cheaper then B&W anytime.. ;)
 

jon33

New Member
Aug 18, 2002
495
0
0
37
go north!
www.imagestation.com
#6
jon33 said:
..its actually cheaper for me to shoot and process tmax400 than fuji superia 100. try searching the forum for people selling bulk rolled B&W film to try it out at lower cost.

:)
note the words 'for me'. so it is true, but its true in a limited sense.
 

Gunjack

New Member
Jul 6, 2002
1,056
0
0
Zimbabwe
Visit site
#7
If you develope b&w film yourself like I do, it is much cheaper than asking the photolabs to develope for you for $5. Definitely cheaper than buying and processing colour film. Basically I just pay for the roll of b&w film, cost around $4.50 and $5.50, or cheaper still if bulk rolled. Ilford HP5+ and Delta series are nice, so are Kodak's Tri-X.
 

Jer76

Senior Member
Apr 21, 2002
1,049
0
36
West
#8
Anyone got comments on fuji neopan?
 

A

andylee

Guest
#9
Jer76 said:
Anyone got comments on fuji neopan?
:thumbsup: Films like FP-4, HP-5, Tri-X, Pan-F and Neopan is my primary choice.
 

Deep Blue

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
17
0
0
42
Boon Lay
Visit site
#10
It's not really cheaper to develop yourself coz you haven't factor in your own labour cost, or opportunity cost.

But it's fun if you enjoy developing yourself.
 

A

andylee

Guest
#11
Deep Blue said:
It's not really cheaper to develop yourself coz you haven't factor in your own labour cost, or opportunity cost.

But it's fun if you enjoy developing yourself.
Ha Ha, I think it's economic to do it myself.just spend some quailty time on your hobby.what i do is to process it myself, then scan it and print the contact print on inkjet paper on epson printer.inkjet paper--->ilford gallarie--->0.70cents only+ ink cost---> S$1.50 ok.imagine asking people to print contact, S$7 to S$12 include processing a roll. :sweat:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom