Canonised said:
Doc, kool down .... why get so agitated and sensitive with words?
Why am I sensitive with words?
Because words have meaning. If we use words and do not mean what the words mean, then why are we using those words?
canonised said:
Personally, I have tried many times in the past to calm DP thru my comments, which mostly indirectly telling him to speak in a nicer tone in public forum and most ppl here who have followed up with DP's threads would have realised that his tone has indeed been less confrontational of late.
Frankly, DP's confrontational attitude is not something I bother with. There are many ways to confront another. Most of the time, nobody provoked him, and he comes up with a blast that can cowed someone else into a state of fear.
canonised said:
"Why don't you tell that to DP?" - last night was the first time I actually pm a total stranger, who is known to be aggressive in his words, to actually suppress his anger and take a few steps back. I am happy to see that he has indeed done that. But this was wrongly interpreted by you that he has cowed. This is a public forum, and i cant lied about these facts.
He issued a challenge. I accept his challenge. He chose not to reply. How am I supposed to interpret that?
But in any case, I laid out my cards clearly for anyone to read and criticise. You read what my responses were.
Now tell me, which part of what I wrote was wrong and deserve to have him issue a challenge to a fight?
Canonised said:
So ppl will ask me again, why only Dp and why i didnt "pacify" the Doc? Well, frankly thru some posts i did try, but indirectly, and i even added some humour to indirectly tell you that we are still members of a family. Lately I did sense that you are "softer" in yr responses to me. That I appreciate.
I became softer to you because you talked less nonsense.
canonised said:
Then maybe why I didnt pm you directly .... well to be honest i feel that you are "super,hyper sensitive" to words and maybe this is not the best of times
As I said, I place great import to words - any time. Do not use words if you do not mean them. I have no ways to understand what you are trying to say apart from your words.
If I see you face to face, I can add a certain degree of alternative interpretation to what you say. But on the net, there is only words to go by.
So use words appropriately.
canonised said:
There are many statements you made which didnt seem agreeable (at least to me) but i defrained from commenting because you have indeed a weakness, that you must defend to the end and emerge the "victor". This is a classic sign of the inferiority complex syndrome. In our daily life, you will meet many of such successful and intelligent ppl who will always have to explain and justify their comments and actions. It's unpleasant for me to make this claim but i will leave it to the readers to conclude. :sweat:
You are now beginning to talk nonsense again.
Do I have to win? Hell! I do not care a damn if I win or lose! It is of no consequence to me!
Let me take a few examples and dissect them for you,and perhaps you can see why I want to bring things to a conclusion.
1 The Zone System.
Now it had been said ad nauseum that the ZS is but a tool to better exposure. Possessing the knowledge of ZS does not ensure one makes great photographs, and not using the ZS does not mean that one cannot make great photographs.
Do you have a problem with that?
But then this bloke called littlewolf must come to challenge that. Now if that little wolfie have some valid points, it is fine. Unfortunately he really showed that he know nuts about exposure, and resorted to technical mumbo-jumbo to confuse others, and he even tried to enlist the opinions of Roger Hicks to support him.
What would you do? He came with a "reputable artist" that we should listen to. Should we?
What happened if the opinions of Roger Hicks were to sway those who are less in the know? What would you do. Read how I dealt with this.
Did I do that to win?
2 Zeckson Chow.
Frankly I do not bother with ZC'z comments. Everytime I saw his comments I just laugh them off. I had never bother to engage him.
Why did I engage him this time? Not because of his comments on the images. I cold not be bothered with that. But because of the insinuation that Gravemaid was less than professional in organising her shoots.
You may disagree with me as did Wai Leong. But I see it differently. it is not about suing. This is not important enough for that. But fairness must prevail.
In any case I have left this alone for the time being. When my friend return next week, I will discuss with him (someone with a Masters in law) to see if my interpretation of ZC's comment has merit.
I was not engaging ZC to win. But to get fairness for Gravemaid.
Now about inferiority-complex. This is most interesting.
You are a trained psychologist? With a masters in psychology? (we all know that one with a bachelor degree is well.. what should I say? worse still, if one's knowledge of psychology is "gained" from a semester of education or from books!). Or perhaps you are a psychiatrist?
Let me ask my friends. I have many friends who are psychiatrists of senior consultant level and professorial standing.
And I work with several psychologists (with masters in psychology). Heck! Even the infamous Dr Chee Soon Juan (a psychologist) had once (briefly) work under my supervision.
But I will ask them if they think I suffer from inferiority-complex. And I have worked with them for years and perhaps know me better than you?
Maybe I can get some insight into my inner self. Hmm, interesting!