seanlim said:Is this lens as sharp as the 50mm(nikkor).....could some1 comment..thanks
seanlim said:yar..i did a search but only this site":
http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=173671&highlight=AF-S+VR+24-120mm+f/3.5-5.6G
proved useful...anw any other comments abt this lens versus the 18-200vr?
kk lets see...i have decided to get a couple of lens to suit my need:King Tiger said:Care to tell us what is your concern, needs and wants ?
So that we can advise you more directly.
I second that view. Even when I got the 18-200, I wasn't expecting the lens to perform that well especially when it's a 11x zoom.roti_prata said:unless ur very demanding, the 18-200vr + 60marco r enuff for most of the time. reviews and tests hav shown the 18-200vr to be better thn xpected of a high magnification lens
If u like the sharpness of the prime lens, then probably u should stick with prime lens.seanlim said:kk lets see...i have decided to get a couple of lens to suit my need:
AF-S VR 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G or the 18-200 VR
24mm/2.8 or the 18-35mm or the 20mm
60mm/105mm macro...
but after using my prime, i realised that theres a big diff in terms of sharpness between it and my kit lens. so i want to have some comparison between the lenses
I like prime's sharpness leh, but I don't like everything prime :bsmilie:Astin said:If u like the sharpness of the prime lens, then probably u should stick with prime lens.
yeaespn said:I like prime's sharpness leh, but I don't like everything prime :bsmilie:
espn said:I like prime's sharpness leh, but I don't like everything prime :bsmilie: