Landscape go 10-18
Travel use 16-70
50 1.8 cheap lens for portrait
24 1.8ZA a must hahaha
For 35 1.8oss u have other version Sigma 30 1.4DN which is cheaper by $200...
Have fun ...
The sigma 30 1.4DN looks good but no OSS.
Landscape go 10-18
Travel use 16-70
50 1.8 cheap lens for portrait
24 1.8ZA a must hahaha
For 35 1.8oss u have other version Sigma 30 1.4DN which is cheaper by $200...
Have fun ...
Thanks guys!
Haha I bought my lens today!
Sony 24mm 1.8 za
Sony 18-105 f4
Samyang 12mm f2.
Haha cost quite a lil. Hahaha thanks for your inputs and advice!
Use yongnuo rf triggers
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Or you can get cheaper option of 18-105pz but lose the 16mm-17mm
yea definitely one of my considerations as well, given that even 35f1.8 can be a little bulky at times (but it's still perfect for me).ecan07 - Sounds like lightweight and smaller size is most important to you. In that case, the choice should be obvious..
What will you do...
Hi there bros, need some advice over here.
Recently I had a problem with my camera after a drop of the camera (damn ouch!). It wasn't from a high distance but it's apparently enough to create some problems. After which my camera could no longer detect my lens, the kit lens 16-50PZ.
Went to Sony Service center, was diagnosed with problem in the lens. They quoted me 300 ish to replace the lens (no more warranty), madness if you ask me! I think I can find second hand lens at below 200 in the forum.
So now I'm stuck. Should i go get a second hand 16-50PZ, or should I go further and upgrade to the Sony 16-70Z lens, which has always impressed me if not for the heavy price? the latter is of cos an upgrade but much more expensive (I can't seem to find any second hand for this now), around 1k vs the former at 100 ish.
Currently I alr have the 35f1.8 (my fav), 50f1.8 (seldom use) and the 55-210 zoom (for some sporting event). I usually like to take food and street photography. but usually I would use the kit lens when i need the wide angle (35f1.8 quite tight at times) and lightweight. with 16-70, I get the wide angle but of cos lose much of the lightweight...
Dunno if i should plunge in with the investment or not. For those who have used both, any advice please??
I guess my questions would be what are you really upgrading for? Say image quality, how visible is the difference in image quality?
And is the cost of upgrading worth it?
About gear acquisition. Seriously..no one can really advise you. Because in the end. Its all about you. Only you. Not us.
If 1 knows better and really need it. No question asked. Just buy it and upgrade.
But in your case..you need to ask. So..It's more of a want, curious than a need. I guess?
with that. I will say.
If getting a better gear will make you happier or even bring the camera out and shoot more. And most importantly, you can afford it. Then. Why not?
But if you're just curious... then you can also rent or buy it..then sell it back. You will loose some money. But at least you had experience n hopefully fun with it while it last.
Nobody can advise you better than yourself on how to spend your own money. Also. Dont look at it as it's an investment. Because it is not. Maybe..if the gear can generate income for you. If not.
Spend within means and if it makes you feel good. It's ok.
You probably get strong vignetting around the corners.Another noob question here
What happens when I mount a E mount (non FE) lens say SEL16-70Z lens onto a E mount FF camera ah? Other than the focal length difference?